﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!--RSS generated by max:presence  Sun, 05 Sep 2010 05:47:26 GMT--><rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"><channel><title>Hudson Gavin Martin &gt; Mia Sudzum</title><link>http://www.hgmlegal.com</link><description>http://www.hgmlegal.com</description><item><title>Patentability of computer programs</title><link>http://www.hgmlegal.com/Articles/Intellectual Property/9/75/Patentability-of-computer-programs.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[Following its review of the proposed Patents Bill, the Commerce Select Committee has recommended excluding computer programs as inventions capable of patent protection.  This recommendation has received a lot of attention and has led to a range of submissions on the issue of patentability of computer programs and the potential impact of the Select Committee’s recommendation.]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 05:47:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>No Copyright in Compilations and Databases?</title><link>http://www.hgmlegal.com/Articles/Intellectual Property/9/67/No-Copyright-in-Compilations-and-Databases.aspx</link><description><![CDATA[In an eagerly awaited decision of the Federal Court of Australia,  Justice Gordon held that no copyright subsists in the White Pages and Yellow Pages directories.  <br /><br />The decision has significant ramifications for producers of compilations and databases of factual information (such as telephone directories, public transport timetables and horse racing guides) as it suggests that such works may not be capable of copyright protection.]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 05:47:27 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>