CCTV and privacy

What is the trade off between keeping us safe and secure using monitoring such as CCTV, versus a step too far for our private lives?

CCTV and privacyCCTV and privacy
Category
Insight | Tech
Insight
|
Tech
Published Date
25
November 2020
Reading Time

As tech law specialists we frequently advise on data privacy and security matters. CCTV monitoring has caught the attention of several clients, specifically how to respond to requests for CCTV footage.

In this article, we review the Privacy Act, the Privacy Commissioner’s CCTV guidelines and a company’s security policy for considerations on the topic.

Do we have to provide copies of CCTV footage should it be requested?

Firstly our response would be, “No”, but you may, in some circumstances, consider allowing the requestor to see the relevant footage(without taking a copy), provide the requester with an extract from the footage with other individuals “blurred” out so as not to be identifiable (if reasonably possible to do), or provide still shots from the footage (but again on a blurred-out basis).

The Privacy Commissioner points out in its Guidelines that in general people have a right to access images of themselves. To start with, access need only be provided if “readily retrievable”. Further, when providing access, the company must not intrude on the privacy of others who are also shown in the footage. 

The Commissioner goes on to say that the “starting point is to give access in the way the individual wants. However, this is not always possible or desirable: 

Giving someone a copy of the footage has different privacy impacts from just allowing someone to come in and view the footage. For instance, it may not be a problem to let someone view a tape. However, there may be a good reason not to provide a copy if the information could be damaging or embarrassing for others who are pictured if it is put on the internet.

If you have the technology to blur or pixelate the faces of the other people on a copy of the footage, this is a good way to protect others’ privacy.

If you cannot provide access to the footage without unreasonably breaching others’ privacy, you could provide the individual with a written description of what they are doing in the footage.”

The Commissioner says that a company should generally treat CCTV footage as confidential to the company and not disclose unless that is one of the company’s purposes in operating a CCTV system. 

Exceptions

Principle 11 of the Privacy Act states that an agency that holds personal information shall not disclose the information to another agency unless one of the listed exceptions applies, including for example:

a)     disclosure of the information is one of the purposes in connection with which the information was obtained or is directly related to the purposes in connection with which the information was obtained;

b)     disclosure is to the individual concerned; or

c)     disclosure is authorised by the individual concerned.

The Privacy Commissioner’s CCTV guidance confirms the application of Principle 11 to CCTV. The guidance applies to non-covert CCTV in ‘public spaces’ (spaces that are completely accessible to the public) and ‘semi-public spaces’ (spaces that, even if privately owned, are accessible to the public during opening hours). The guidance stipulates that CCTV footage should only be used or disclosed for the original purpose for which it was collected.

What can companies do to help manage such requests?

Companies may determine their own policies with respect to CCTV and whether access to its footage will be made available. It may be that such a policy might say that “Requests for access to the system from interested parties will be denied unless good cause is given, and the Company formally approves the requested access”.  

In assessing any request for access, the Company should have regard to the relevant Privacy Principles under the Act (in this case Principle 5 which protects personal information from unauthorised access, Principle 6 under which Individuals have the right to access personal information the Company holds about them, Principle 7 which allows correction of incorrect information, and Principle 11 which deals with the disclosure of personal information).  

The Company should also have regard to the Privacy Commissioner’s guidelines and also to the Company’s own policies and the purposes behind the use of a camera surveillance system.

It should be considered too that any request made to a Government organisation (e.g. ministry, police, public hospital, school) for access to information captured by the CCTV system is also to be treated as an Official Information Request and so the timelines need to be respected and so the Company’s CCTV team involved from an early stage.

Should you find yourself on the receiving end of CCTV requests or need support on privacy matters we can help.

Services in this insight

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.

Services in this insight

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.

Services in this insight

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore.

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.
Previous Article
Next Article

From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business

Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground

Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand

The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships

New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code

IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know

OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now

AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI

New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know

Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia

Consumer law update 2025

Open banking launches in New Zealand

Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act

Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta

Open banking almost live

Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act

Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand

Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand

Open banking regulations released for consultation

Ten tips for buy-side M&A success

A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?

Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)

Important changes made to the Privacy Act

New Zealand may ban social media for young users

Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way

Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet

Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media

Security guidance released for emerging tech companies

Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back

Consumer law update 2024

New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go

The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”

New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour

WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted

Doing business in the Middle East

AI and advertising – What producers need to know

Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs

Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?

Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code

Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year

Is End-to-End to end?

Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement

Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released

Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?

Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?

Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation

The copyright conundrum with generative AI

Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools

Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?

Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament

New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline

The long and winding road to royalties

Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal

EU gets closer to AI laws

UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box

A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill

Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data

New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes

Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm

The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society

Common myths about copyright online

Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?

Big boost to gaming

Is your product “AI powered”?

The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right

Space Law in New Zealand

You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law

Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right

Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging

One Act to Rule Them All

A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS

Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020

NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched

Are you being unfair?

A new Companies Office levy is one step closer

Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?

From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners

Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force

Paying the price for getting privacy wrong

Can AI be an inventor?

Finfluencer Crackdown

TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch

Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'

Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do

The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t

Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)

The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships

Building Blocks of Trust

Firm News | Legal Rankings

Buy Now, Regulate Soon

Ten simple things

Funding the Future

Cyber Security for Start-ups

Fit for purchase

The Screen Industry Workers Bill

UK/New Zealand Trade Deal Takes Flight

Palmer v Alalääkkölä

Other articles you
might like

The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships
2
April 2026

Negotiating a fintech partnership agreement is not a zero sum game.

Andrew Dentice

Partner

New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
1
April 2026

New rule 3A means individuals must be notified about indirect collection under the Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025.

Kyra Vince

Special Counsel – Knowledge

Anchali Anandanayagam

Partner

Open banking launches in New Zealand
2
December 2025

The official commencement of open banking in New Zealand is a significant milestone for the local industry.

Andrew Dentice

Partner

Kyra Vince

Special Counsel – Knowledge