Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm
No matter how small or large your law firm is, the right technology can help you streamline your operations and offer better services to clients.
.jpeg)
The right technology can help law firms streamline their operations, automate tasks and offer better services to clients. Examples include practice management systems, document management software, e-discovery tools, legal research tools, billing and invoicing software, and video conferencing and communication tools such as Zoom, Teams and Slack.
But choosing the right technology can be time-consuming and daunting.
In this article I set out a few factors to consider when procuring technology, based on my experience with our firm that started 15 years ago with eight people and has now grown to almost 50.
Identify your needs
Every firm has unique requirements so the first step in procuring technology is to identify what you need. For example, some firms may want an all-in-one practice management system for their time recording, billing, client relationship and document management. Others may want separate systems to perform some or all of those individual functions.
We use a practice management system that has limited document management capability. As our firm grew, so did the number of documents and emails being created, stored and filed. Rather than trying to find one practice management system to meet all our needs, we decided to implement a separate best-of-breed document management system (DMS) that would work with our existing practice management system. So it’s important to evaluate your specific challenges and consider the areas where you want to improve efficiency, reduce costs or enhance client service. Our DMS has helped us to improve in all those areas.
If you’re not sure where to start, talk to other law firms and ask what solutions they’ve used, how they’ve found those solutions and what they might have done differently.
Evaluate the technology
Once you’ve identified your needs, you should consider the available technology options. Look for solutions that are user-friendly, customisable and scalable. Also consider the level of support available from the vendor, as well as the cost of the technology. Take advantage of free or limited-cost trials or demos to test the software before making a purchase. For example, we are upgrading our phone, video conferencing, instant messaging and mobile technology platform and have been trialling a solution for the last few months at no cost to ensure it works.
Evaluate the vendor
When selecting technology vendors, it’s important to do some proper due diligence. How long have they been around? Who are their customers? Do they have a decent-sized New Zealand customer base or will you be one of their first local customers?
Look for vendors with experience in working with law firms and a track record of providing reliable and effective solutions. Ask for references from other law firms to get a sense of the vendor’s reputation.
Consider integration
Technology should work seamlessly with your existing systems and processes. It’s important to consider how it will integrate (e.g., practice management systems, DMS, communication and messaging systems, email, calendar) and other software you use, such as accounting or HR software (e.g., Xero or MYOB) and standard productivity software (e.g., Office 365).
We spend a lot of time ensuring our systems talk to each other. It’s equally important to ensure there is a commitment from your vendors to work together:
- when there is a technology project underway;
- to resolve an issue in your technology environment; or
- to ensure the smooth day-to-day operations of all your systems.
Security and compliance
Legal technology often involves sensitive client information so security and compliance are crucial. Remember, you and your firm have obligations under:
- the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 to ensure information remains confidential and to prevent any person from perpetrating a crime or fraud through the firm’s practice. The rules specifically refer to taking reasonable steps to ensure the security of and access to electronic systems and passwords; and
- the Privacy Act, in particular, Privacy Principle 5: when holding personal information, you must have “security safeguards” in place to protect against loss, access, use, modification or disclosure.
Make sure the technology is designed to protect confidential information and ideally meets industry standards for security (e.g., ISO27001 and ISO27002, which are international standards and guidelines for information security). Look for technologies with robust security features, such as encryption, multi-factor authentication and access controls.
Training and adoption
The success of a technology implementation depends on user buy-in so before procuring technology, consider how you will train staff to use it effectively. Ensure the vendor offers training and support to help staff get up to speed quickly. It’s also useful for the vendor to train someone in the firm who will provide training to new joiners and others (i.e., “train the trainer”).
You should also have a plan for communicating the introduction of the new technology, promoting adoption and encouraging staff to use it consistently. I remember hearing a near-disaster story from someone at another law firm that introduced a new system one Monday but people were told of the change only that morning!
Consider scalability
As your law firm grows, your technology needs may change. It is important to consider the scalability of any technology you procure. You should consider whether it can accommodate your firm’s growth and changing needs, and whether it can be easily scaled up or down.
For example, one reason we moved our systems from our physical server room into the cloud about five years ago was to give us the ability to scale up quickly. Previously, to avoid running out of storage space because of the increasing volume of emails and other documents being created, stored or filed, we would have to physically swap out hard drives for larger ones, which would result in downtime. Now we simply request our cloud provider to increase storage space and this is done almost immediately.
Read the fine print
No matter how small or large your law firm is, there should be a written contract in place between the firm and the vendor. You should review the contract and be prepared to negotiate it.
Some of the issues to consider in your contracts with your vendor include:
Term and termination
Consider the term of the contract and how it can be terminated. If the technology you are procuring is business critical (as opposed to "nice-to-have"’), you may want to agree an initial term with an automatic rollover for a similar length term (unless you decide not to continue before renewal occurs). I’ve seen contracts that roll over after an initial term on a month-by-month basis, which wouldn’t give the firm much certainty that the technology would be available after that initial term. Give yourself plenty of time before renewal to raise any issues with the vendor and negotiate any terms (such as pricing). If you’re using technology that is nice-to-have but not business critical, consider whether you want the right to terminate on short notice (e.g., 30 days) if you decide the technology is no longer suitable for your firm’s needs or if the uptake by people in the firm is not as high as expected.
Pricing
Vendors will often provide sharp pricing to get customers onboard. Consider what controls are in place to limit price increases after, say, an initial term. By the time the initial term is up, you’re unlikely to be moving to a new system so you don’t want to be hit with a significant price increase.
Service levels
Consider what levels of service are provided to the firm. How quickly will the vendor respond to a request for support? What is the availability or "up-time" of the service, particularly if it is cloud-based? For example, if you have a time recording solution offered by an overseas vendor, you don’t want them carrying out any scheduled maintenance during working hours.
Data security / privacy / confidentiality
One of the greatest risks a law firm faces is a security or cyber incident. The contract should set out in detail how the vendor deals with data security, privacy and confidentiality. How quickly will the vendor notify you if it is aware of a data or security breach? Does it even have an obligation to do so?
Liability
Check out the vendor’s liability position. While it’s common for a vendor to exclude liability for indirect and consequential loss, I have seen several legal technology contracts that try to exclude all forms of loss and/or have very low liability caps.
It’s common for a vendor and customer to agree that the vendor has unlimited liability (or at least higher liability caps) for all forms of loss for breaches of data, privacy and security as well as the standard carve-outs for beaches of confidentiality, infringement of a third party’s intellectual property rights or a wilful breach. However, typically a vendor’s initial position is that liability for these events is subject to the general liability cap, not an unlimited or "super" cap, which has to be negotiated.
Procuring technology for law firms requires careful evaluation and planning. By identifying your needs, evaluating the technology options, considering integration and security, planning for training and adoption, evaluating the vendor and entering into a suitable contract, you can select the right technology solution to improve your law firm’s efficiency and provide better service to clients.
This article was first published in LawNews
Services in this insight
From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business
Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground
Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand
The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships
New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know
OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now
AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI
New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know
Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia
Consumer law update 2025
Open banking launches in New Zealand
Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act
Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta
Open banking almost live
Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act
Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand
Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand
Open banking regulations released for consultation
Ten tips for buy-side M&A success
A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?
Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)
Important changes made to the Privacy Act
New Zealand may ban social media for young users
Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way
Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet
Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media
Security guidance released for emerging tech companies
Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back
Consumer law update 2024
New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go
The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”
New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour
WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted
Doing business in the Middle East
AI and advertising – What producers need to know
Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs
Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?
Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year
Is End-to-End to end?
Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement
Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released
Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?
Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?
Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation
The copyright conundrum with generative AI
Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools
Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?
Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament
New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline
The long and winding road to royalties
Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal
EU gets closer to AI laws
UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box
A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill
Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data
New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes
Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm
The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society
Common myths about copyright online
Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?
Big boost to gaming
Is your product “AI powered”?
The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right
Space Law in New Zealand
You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law
Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right
Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging
One Act to Rule Them All
A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS
Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020
NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched
Are you being unfair?
Are you legal?
Power Up 2022
A new Companies Office levy is one step closer
Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?
From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners
I'm back, baby
Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force
Paying the price for getting privacy wrong
Can AI be an inventor?
Finfluencer Crackdown
TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch
Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'
Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do
The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t
Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)
The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships
Building Blocks of Trust
Firm News | Legal Rankings
Buy Now, Regulate Soon
Ten simple things
Funding the Future
Cyber Security for Start-ups
Fit for purchase
The Screen Industry Workers Bill
UK/New Zealand Trade Deal Takes Flight
Palmer v Alalääkkölä
Other articles you
might like
Negotiating a fintech partnership agreement is not a zero sum game.
New rule 3A means individuals must be notified about indirect collection under the Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025.
The official commencement of open banking in New Zealand is a significant milestone for the local industry.







.jpg)





%20(2).jpg)