Ever wondered what your lawyer is really trying to say?
Isn't it fair to think that the customer should be able to understand the advice that the lawyer provides?

This is the first of a couple of articles which will look at how lawyers write. It is not about “legal writing”, nor is it about “legalese”. We’ll be looking at some commonly used words and phrases, we’ll think about why they have been used, what they might mean, and what could have been written instead.
For a number of years we’ve kept a list of words and phrases that have been found in letters from lawyers, in documents, emails and other places. It is a much longer list than it should be. It’s a source of constant wonder that some of these words and phrases are used at all, let alone regularly. But let’s first look at why this is important (or even interesting) at all.
A lawyer’s role is be an adviser or an advocate for its client (or customer if we look to keep things simple). So a lawyer is a hired hand, helping its customer through a situation that the customer couldn’t deal with as well on its own.
If that’s the case then it would be fair to think that the customer should be able to understand the advice that the lawyer provides, or be able to follow what the lawyer is saying when “advocating” for that customer. However that doesn’t always seem to be what happens. Lawyers are often described as being hard to understand, and that “legalese” is a difficult language all on its own.
As a young lawyer one of the most valuable early lessons Iearned was from a partner criticising an “opinion” I’d written. Legalese creeps in straight away – an opinion is a written piece of advice designed to advise a client of the law, and how it might apply to a situation. In that case I’d written what I thought was a splendid piece of work. I’d considered the problem, looked at the law, thought about similar examples and recommended a proposed course of action for the customer.
The problem was that I’d put that recommended proposed course of action at the end of my splendid piece of writing. The partner’s comment was “I’m not reading six pages of how smart you are to find the answer, and neither will the client. Write it again with the answer at the top of the first page.” Lesson number one – the customer wants to know what you recommend they do, rather than get a lesson in the law. So advice is always at the start of a letter or email to a client – they expect you to be smart, so you don’t need to show off.
To finish this first note here’s a phrase we found in a document a few months ago:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto and to a duplicate hereof set the hands of the respective authorized officials on the day and year first hereinbefore written.
How else could they possibly have said that?
Services in this insight
Consultation opens on New Zealand's payment services regulation
Modern slavery regulation on the way – Is your business ready?
From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business
Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground
Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand
The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships
New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know
OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now
AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI
New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know
Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia
Consumer law update 2025
Open banking launches in New Zealand
Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act
Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta
Open banking almost live
Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act
Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand
Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand
Open banking regulations released for consultation
Ten tips for buy-side M&A success
A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?
Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)
Important changes made to the Privacy Act
New Zealand may ban social media for young users
Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way
Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet
Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media
Security guidance released for emerging tech companies
Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back
Consumer law update 2024
New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go
The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”
New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour
WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted
Doing business in the Middle East
AI and advertising – What producers need to know
Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs
Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?
Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year
Is End-to-End to end?
Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement
Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released
Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?
Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?
Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation
The copyright conundrum with generative AI
Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools
Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?
Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament
New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline
The long and winding road to royalties
Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal
EU gets closer to AI laws
UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box
A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill
Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data
New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes
Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm
The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society
Common myths about copyright online
Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?
Big boost to gaming
Is your product “AI powered”?
The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right
Space Law in New Zealand
You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law
Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right
Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging
One Act to Rule Them All
A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS
Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020
NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched
Are you being unfair?
Are you legal?
Power Up 2022
A new Companies Office levy is one step closer
Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?
From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners
I'm back, baby
Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force
Paying the price for getting privacy wrong
Can AI be an inventor?
Finfluencer Crackdown
TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch
Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'
Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do
The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t
Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)
The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships
Building Blocks of Trust
Firm News | Legal Rankings
Buy Now, Regulate Soon
Ten simple things
Funding the Future
Cyber Security for Start-ups
Fit for purchase
The Screen Industry Workers Bill
Other articles you
might like
New modern slavery legislation is progressing through Parliament and is now open for public consultation.
Hudson Gavin Martin was delighted to once again author the New Zealand chapter of Lexology In Depth: Space Law.
The Government’s new Cyber Security Strategy 2026–2030 and Action Plan 2026–2027 signal a renewed push to strengthen New Zealand’s resilience to digital threats.
.jpg)









