Life Story Rights - Do I Need Them?

It’s a question that we often get asked by content creators. The answer seems to surprise people.

Life Story Rights - Do I Need Them?Life Story Rights - Do I Need Them?
Category
Insight | IP
Insight
|
IP
Published Date
5
August 2021
Reading Time

It’s a question that we often get asked by content creators: “I am telling a story that is based on the life of a real person - do I need to obtain life story rights, in order to tell that story?” The answer seems to surprise people. We tend to assume that there must be some kind of “general IP right” in the story of someone’s life. In New Zealand however, there is no such thing. That said, the way in which you tell the story of another person may engage the law of defamation, invasion of privacy or breach of confidence.

In this country, anyone can tell the true life story of another person using publicly available information, without needing a rights clearance. Problems tend to arise when that story is not true, or you can’t establish that it is true, where the information used for your story is private or confidential information, or where international elements to your story (such as the subject or distribution channels) engage a right of publicity.  

Defamation

The risk of defamation will only arise if your story makes a statement of fact about an identifiable living person, which tends to lower that person’s reputation in the mind of the public. There are several points to unpack here.  

Firstly, under New Zealand law, you cannot technically defame the dead. If the story that you are telling is about a deceased person, then no matter how damaging it is, their estate will not be able to sue you for defamation. Their (still living) acquaintances or relatives may have a cause of action against you, but only if your story also defames them personally.  

The second point to note is that defamation focuses on whether your statement has lowered that person’s reputation. This will involve an analysis of their existing reputation, to establish whether your statement has lowered it.  

The next point is that truth is an absolute defence to defamation, so if your statement is true (and importantly, you can prove that it is true) then even if the statement is damaging, you won’t be liable for making it. But can you prove that it is true? Do you have witnesses? Do you have supporting documents? Additional defences to defamation include honest opinion, qualified privilege and the public interest defence.    

Invasion of Privacy

If your story includes facts that were reasonably expected to remain private, and your story gives publicity to those facts that would be considered highly offensive to the objective and reasonable person, then you may be liable for invasion of privacy. However, this is a high threshold.    

There must be a reasonable expectation of privacy in the relevant facts. If the subject of your story has already publicised these facts herself, or they are generally already well known, then she will not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in them.  

The publicity given to those facts must also be considered highly objectionable to the objective and reasonable person. There is a legitimate public concern defence.

Breach of Confidence

If your story includes information about a person that is of a confidential nature, which was imparted to you (or which you learned about) in circumstances obliging you to keep it private, and your story discloses that information to the detriment of the subject, you may be liable for breach of confidence. This applies even where you have not contractually agreed (such as by NDA) to keep it confidential.  

Right of Publicity

The right of publicity gives a person the right to control the commercial exploitation of their name, likeness and recognisable details. There is currently no right of publicity under New Zealand law, however it is a very valuable property right in large parts of the USA and civil law jurisdictions. If your story will be distributed internationally, or your subject is from a jurisdiction which recognises this right, you may need a rights clearance for it.  

If there is any risk of defamation, invasion of privacy, breach of confidence or the engagement of publicity rights in the story that you are telling, then it is wise to obtain life story rights. If you need help, come and have a chat with us.

Social media image credit: Etienne Giradet

Services in this insight

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.

Services in this insight

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.

Services in this insight

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore.

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.
Previous Article
Next Article

Fair Trading Act changes will increase governance risk for business

New Zealand’s online gambling laws get a shake up

Consultation opens on New Zealand's payment services regulation

Modern slavery regulation on the way – Is your business ready?

From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business

Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground

Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand

The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships

New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code

IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know

OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now

AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI

New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know

Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia

Consumer law update 2025

Open banking launches in New Zealand

Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act

Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta

Open banking almost live

Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act

Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand

Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand

Open banking regulations released for consultation

Ten tips for buy-side M&A success

A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?

Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)

Important changes made to the Privacy Act

New Zealand may ban social media for young users

Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way

Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet

Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media

Security guidance released for emerging tech companies

Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back

Consumer law update 2024

New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go

The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”

New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour

WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted

Doing business in the Middle East

AI and advertising – What producers need to know

Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs

Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?

Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code

Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year

Is End-to-End to end?

Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement

Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released

Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?

Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?

Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation

The copyright conundrum with generative AI

Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools

Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?

Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament

New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline

The long and winding road to royalties

Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal

EU gets closer to AI laws

UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box

A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill

Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data

New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes

Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm

The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society

Common myths about copyright online

Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?

Big boost to gaming

Is your product “AI powered”?

The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right

Space Law in New Zealand

You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law

Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right

Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging

One Act to Rule Them All

A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS

Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020

NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched

Are you being unfair?

A new Companies Office levy is one step closer

Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?

From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners

Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force

Paying the price for getting privacy wrong

Can AI be an inventor?

Finfluencer Crackdown

TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch

Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'

Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do

The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t

Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)

The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships

Building Blocks of Trust

Firm News | Legal Rankings

Buy Now, Regulate Soon

Ten simple things

Funding the Future

Cyber Security for Start-ups

Other articles you
might like

Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia
22
December 2025

A recent Court of Appeal decision provides long awaited clarity for businesses on the lawful use of another party’s trade mark in New Zealand.

Caitlin Hadlee

Caitlin Hadlee

Special Counsel

Ellie Ryan

Ellie Ryan

Senior Associate

Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta
13
November 2025

Two contrasting court judgments have been released on whether it is legal to train LLMs using copyright protected works.

Caitlin Hadlee

Caitlin Hadlee

Special Counsel

Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act
5
September 2025

The EU Data Act is about to change how Kiwi firms handle customer data.

Edwin Lim

Edwin Lim

Partner

Kyra Vince

Kyra Vince

Special Counsel – Knowledge