Out with the copper in with the glass – The Copper Withdrawal Code
Soon, a copper connection will be a distant memory, as we come to rely on a fibre optic network.

Since the first landline telephones in 1881, Aotearoa has been connected by a network of copper cables, the same technology that in 1989 put Aotearoa universities in touch with the world wide web. For most of us however, a copper connection will soon be a distant memory, as we come to rely on a fibre optic network.
As part of Aotearoa’s bid to provide world-class connectivity to every home in the country, the government passed the Telecommunications (New Regulatory Framework) Amendment Act 2018 which required the Commerce Commission to prepare the Copper Withdrawal Code (the “Code”). The purpose of the Code, which came into force on 1 March 2021, is to ensure consumers are adequately protected during the upgrade of the country’s communication networks from copper to fibre optic cabling.
Click here for more information from the Commerce Commission's website.
The Code applies where Chorus seeks to cease supplying a copper service to:
- an end-user (being a person who has a contract with a retail service provider (such as 2 Degree’s, Spark, or Vodafone);
- a retail service provider or a relevant fibre service provider (wholesale service providers such as Northpower Fibre, UltraFast Fibre, Enable Networks but not Chorus, which is excluded from the Code’s definition).
The Code creates requirements that Chorus must comply with before it can stop providing a copper service.
The Code requires Chorus to comply with specified notice requirements where it proposes to withdraw a copper service. In the case of ends users, Chorus must give end users at least six months’ notice of any proposed withdrawal of the copper services, as well as information about how to order and connect a fibre service.
This notice then triggers notification requirements in respect of the retail service provider and relevant fibre service provider. If following receipt of Chorus’ notice, an end user then places an order with a retail service provider for a fibre service connection to be installed, the relevant fibre service provider must install one within a reasonable timeframe before Chorus stops supplying the copper service and at no cost to the person placing the order.
Chorus can only stop supplying copper services where end users can access the same services over the fibre network. In areas where fibre is not currently available Chorus must continue to supply copper services.
If an end user chooses not to install a fibre connection following the initial notice from Chorus, Chorus is required to provide a further notice to that end user before the copper services can be discontinued for that end user.
If end users have a complaint relating to Chorus’ compliance with Code, then they can raise the complaint with the Telecommunications Disputes Resolution Service (TDRS). TDRS is an independent service that helps consumers manage complaints about telecommunications products and services. Click here for more information.
While the Code came into effect on 1 March 2021, Chorus is not permitted to stop supplying copper services under the Code until at least 1 September 2021.
Chorus claims to have already connected 580,000 homes to fibre and made 1,150,000 “fibre ready”. For many people the change to fibre is already a reality. However after the first stage of the Government’s Ultrafast Broadband (“UFB”)Initiative, 21% of Aotearoa was unconnected to fibre. Upon the UFB Initiative’s completion in 2022, 13% of Aotearoa will remain unconnected to fibre.
For those who are not able to access a fibre network and for those who rely on services operating on copper cabling such as corded telephones and medical alarms, the Code ensures they do not get left behind. This also allows the time to arrange for solutions that fit their needs in a copper-free country.
Although we are not as old as the copper network, we have extensive experience with the telco industry. If you have any questions or are wondering how you could use our expertise in your business, please get in touch.
This article was written by Anchali Anandanayagam and Andrew Rose.
Services in this insight
Consultation opens on New Zealand's payment services regulation
Modern slavery regulation on the way – Is your business ready?
From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business
Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground
Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand
The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships
New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know
OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now
AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI
New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know
Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia
Consumer law update 2025
Open banking launches in New Zealand
Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act
Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta
Open banking almost live
Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act
Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand
Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand
Open banking regulations released for consultation
Ten tips for buy-side M&A success
A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?
Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)
Important changes made to the Privacy Act
New Zealand may ban social media for young users
Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way
Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet
Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media
Security guidance released for emerging tech companies
Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back
Consumer law update 2024
New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go
The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”
New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour
WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted
Doing business in the Middle East
AI and advertising – What producers need to know
Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs
Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?
Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year
Is End-to-End to end?
Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement
Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released
Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?
Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?
Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation
The copyright conundrum with generative AI
Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools
Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?
Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament
New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline
The long and winding road to royalties
Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal
EU gets closer to AI laws
UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box
A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill
Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data
New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes
Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm
The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society
Common myths about copyright online
Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?
Big boost to gaming
Is your product “AI powered”?
The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right
Space Law in New Zealand
You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law
Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right
Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging
One Act to Rule Them All
A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS
Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020
NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched
Are you being unfair?
Are you legal?
Power Up 2022
A new Companies Office levy is one step closer
Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?
From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners
I'm back, baby
Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force
Paying the price for getting privacy wrong
Can AI be an inventor?
Finfluencer Crackdown
TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch
Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'
Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do
The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t
Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)
The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships
Building Blocks of Trust
Firm News | Legal Rankings
Buy Now, Regulate Soon
Ten simple things
Funding the Future
Cyber Security for Start-ups
Fit for purchase
The Screen Industry Workers Bill
Other articles you
might like
New Zealand is consulting on reforms to its payment services regulatory framework, with submissions closing 3 July 2026.
Negotiating a fintech partnership agreement is not a zero sum game.
New rule 3A means individuals must be notified about indirect collection under the Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025.
.jpg)










