Out with the copper in with the glass – The Copper Withdrawal Code

Soon, a copper connection will be a distant memory, as we come to rely on a fibre optic network.

Out with the copper in with the glass – The Copper Withdrawal CodeOut with the copper in with the glass – The Copper Withdrawal Code
Category
Insight | Tech
Insight
|
Tech
Published Date
12
April 2021
Reading Time

Since the first landline telephones in 1881, Aotearoa has been connected by a network of copper cables, the same technology that in 1989 put Aotearoa universities in touch with the world wide web. For most of us however, a copper connection will soon be a distant memory, as we come to rely on a fibre optic network.

As part of Aotearoa’s bid to provide world-class connectivity to every home in the country, the government passed the Telecommunications (New Regulatory Framework) Amendment Act 2018 which required the Commerce Commission to prepare the Copper Withdrawal Code (the “Code”). The purpose of the Code, which came into force on 1 March 2021, is to ensure consumers are adequately protected during the upgrade of the country’s communication networks from copper to fibre optic cabling.

Click here for more information from the Commerce Commission's website.

The Code applies where Chorus seeks to cease supplying a copper service to:

  • an end-user (being a person who has a contract with a retail service provider (such as 2 Degree’s, Spark, or Vodafone);
  • a retail service provider or a relevant fibre service provider (wholesale service providers such as Northpower Fibre, UltraFast Fibre, Enable Networks but not Chorus, which is excluded from the Code’s definition).

The Code creates requirements that Chorus must comply with before it can stop providing a copper service.

The Code requires Chorus to comply with specified notice requirements where it proposes to withdraw a copper service. In the case of ends users, Chorus must give end users at least six months’ notice of any proposed withdrawal of the copper services, as well as information about how to order and connect a fibre service.

This notice then triggers notification requirements in respect of the retail service provider and relevant fibre service provider. If following receipt of Chorus’ notice, an end user then places an order with a retail service provider for a fibre service connection to be installed, the relevant fibre service provider must install one within a reasonable timeframe before Chorus stops supplying the copper service and at no cost to the person placing the order.

Chorus can only stop supplying copper services where end users can access the same services over the fibre network. In areas where fibre is not currently available Chorus must continue to supply copper services.

If an end user chooses not to install a fibre connection following the initial notice from Chorus, Chorus is required to provide a further notice to that end user before the copper services can be discontinued for that end user.  

If end users have a complaint relating to Chorus’ compliance with Code, then they can raise the complaint with the Telecommunications Disputes Resolution Service (TDRS). TDRS is an independent service that helps consumers manage complaints about telecommunications products and services. Click here for more information.

While the Code came into effect on 1 March 2021, Chorus is not permitted to stop supplying copper services under the Code until at least 1 September 2021.  

Chorus claims to have already connected 580,000 homes to fibre and made 1,150,000 “fibre ready”. For many people the change to fibre is already a reality. However after the first stage of the Government’s Ultrafast Broadband (“UFB”)Initiative, 21% of Aotearoa was unconnected to fibre. Upon the UFB Initiative’s completion in 2022, 13% of Aotearoa will remain unconnected to fibre.

For those who are not able to access a fibre network and for those who rely on services operating on copper cabling such as corded telephones and medical alarms, the Code ensures they do not get left behind. This also allows the time to arrange for solutions that fit their needs in a copper-free country.

Although we are not as old as the copper network, we have extensive experience with the telco industry. If you have any questions or are wondering how you could use our expertise in your business, please get in touch.

This article was written by Anchali Anandanayagam and Andrew Rose.

Services in this insight

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.

Services in this insight

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.

Services in this insight

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore.

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.
Previous Article
Next Article

Consultation opens on New Zealand's payment services regulation

Modern slavery regulation on the way – Is your business ready?

From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business

Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground

Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand

The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships

New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code

IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know

OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now

AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI

New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know

Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia

Consumer law update 2025

Open banking launches in New Zealand

Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act

Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta

Open banking almost live

Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act

Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand

Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand

Open banking regulations released for consultation

Ten tips for buy-side M&A success

A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?

Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)

Important changes made to the Privacy Act

New Zealand may ban social media for young users

Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way

Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet

Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media

Security guidance released for emerging tech companies

Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back

Consumer law update 2024

New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go

The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”

New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour

WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted

Doing business in the Middle East

AI and advertising – What producers need to know

Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs

Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?

Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code

Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year

Is End-to-End to end?

Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement

Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released

Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?

Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?

Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation

The copyright conundrum with generative AI

Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools

Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?

Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament

New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline

The long and winding road to royalties

Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal

EU gets closer to AI laws

UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box

A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill

Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data

New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes

Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm

The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society

Common myths about copyright online

Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?

Big boost to gaming

Is your product “AI powered”?

The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right

Space Law in New Zealand

You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law

Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right

Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging

One Act to Rule Them All

A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS

Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020

NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched

Are you being unfair?

A new Companies Office levy is one step closer

Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?

From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners

Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force

Paying the price for getting privacy wrong

Can AI be an inventor?

Finfluencer Crackdown

TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch

Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'

Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do

The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t

Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)

The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships

Building Blocks of Trust

Firm News | Legal Rankings

Buy Now, Regulate Soon

Ten simple things

Funding the Future

Cyber Security for Start-ups

Fit for purchase

The Screen Industry Workers Bill

Other articles you
might like

Consultation opens on New Zealand's payment services regulation
26
May 2026

New Zealand is consulting on reforms to its payment services regulatory framework, with submissions closing 3 July 2026.

Andrew Dentice

Andrew Dentice

Partner

Kyra Vince

Kyra Vince

Special Counsel – Knowledge

The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships
2
April 2026

Negotiating a fintech partnership agreement is not a zero sum game.

Andrew Dentice

Andrew Dentice

Partner

New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
1
April 2026

New rule 3A means individuals must be notified about indirect collection under the Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025.

Kyra Vince

Kyra Vince

Special Counsel – Knowledge

Anchali Anandanayagam

Anchali Anandanayagam

Partner