Social media is only part of the problem

Facebook has hit the headlines again for the wrong reasons. Whistle Blowers are suggesting that it has made decisions that put profit before the safety and wellbeing of its users.

Social media is only part of the problemSocial media is only part of the problem
Category
Insight | Media
Insight
|
Media
Published Date
28
October 2021
Reading Time

Facebook has hit the headlines again for the wrong reasons. Whistle Blowers are suggesting that it has made decisions that put profit before the safety and wellbeing of its users. The Whistle Blowers suggest that changing the way in which the platform promotes content could be easily implemented, but that there is internal resistance to this as it will result in less controversy, therefore less use and ultimately less profits.

It is difficult to evaluate the merits of these claims because (and the Whistle Blowers make this point) we don’t have access to all the information. Certainly this is something that the governments of the world could assist with. The US congress and the British government inquiries will help but it appears that a more concerted effort to get the information will be required. It is unlikely that all of the information will be offered up voluntarily – which one of us would willingly share information that doesn’t paint us in the best of lights. Particularly in a country such as the US where the population is so divided at the moment.  

It seems that social media is capable of delivering so much good and doing so much harm in the same way. Many of us will remember the heady days of the Arab spring where the platform was used to co-ordinate and organise protest. Unfortunately that same platform was able to be used by those in power in Myanmar to incite the genocide of the Rohingya.  

Social media allows people to stay in touch and find like-minded people for support. Unfortunately it also allows those that want to spread misinformation to find a home for it and to mislead and deceive those that may not be able to sort the truth from the lies and are too quick to trust.

But all of this is just part of the problem. The debate that I watched over the weekend highlighted an issue for me that has its heart in social media but is also very much a symptom of the age we find ourselves in. Social media has allowed us to express our outrage without needing to necessarily stop and think of the consequences for others. People consider that social media is the modern town square. But unfortunately it doesn’t operate quite like the town square – the people in it are often nameless and faceless. And as a result they feel that they are able to act in a way that they might not choose to if they were likely to be held to account.  

This weekend what initially started as a comment from Dave Dobbyn - that negative comments about the non-vaccinated were not helpful - resulted in a bit of a pile on to somebody that is seen by most as a great kiwi. The pile on ceased to be about the issue but more an attack on the person. Since when is this healthy debate?  

In fact debate of this nature is only going to make things worse. If we cannot provide a supportive environment in which the issues are discussed then for those that are nervous about issues, such as vaccination, we are only going to drive them to a place where they can feel safe. A place where people show that they are listening to their concerns. Unfortunately it appears that this is a place where people will feed them the misinformation that will only harden their resolve.  

Now is the time to build a place where accurate information can be shared and debate can be had.

I’m not sure what the Whistle Blowers have seen as possible, but is now the time to try to link people more closely to their identity so that they are less likely to behave in a manner they would not otherwise behave in public? Is now the time to implement a rating system like you find on say trademe or the ride share apps. Is now the time to implement roles that rate trust – like trip advisor?

If we implemented one of these, will it result in one of the great strengths of the social media being lost? The fact that discussion can be had anonymously, can in some circumstances allow for people to be braver about their misgivings, their fears and their circumstances.  

I am not sure what the answer is but we should be considering more closely how we can have a better debate on things without fear of someone attacking us personally. Now is a time to support each other, not tear people down. A time to unite not to divide. We are all feeling a little more remote and disconnected than normal right now thanks to COVID so now is a time to look to change things.  

While governments will continue to look to ensure that these platforms are doing the right thing, we should look to do the same. The platforms are only a reflection of what we are asking for and responding to. We should look to set an example, whether it is where we invest, where we spend our time, who we share our information with. And this will hopefully assist in the change I think we are all looking for.

Oh and for what it is worth, I am also double vaccinated and have done so for my own protection, the protection of the ones that I love and for the good of the community.

Social media image credit: Giles Lambert

Services in this insight

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.

Services in this insight

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.

Services in this insight

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore.

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.
Previous Article
Next Article

From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business

Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground

Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand

The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships

New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code

IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know

OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now

AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI

New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know

Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia

Consumer law update 2025

Open banking launches in New Zealand

Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act

Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta

Open banking almost live

Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act

Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand

Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand

Open banking regulations released for consultation

Ten tips for buy-side M&A success

A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?

Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)

Important changes made to the Privacy Act

New Zealand may ban social media for young users

Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way

Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet

Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media

Security guidance released for emerging tech companies

Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back

Consumer law update 2024

New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go

The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”

New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour

WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted

Doing business in the Middle East

AI and advertising – What producers need to know

Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs

Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?

Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code

Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year

Is End-to-End to end?

Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement

Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released

Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?

Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?

Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation

The copyright conundrum with generative AI

Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools

Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?

Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament

New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline

The long and winding road to royalties

Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal

EU gets closer to AI laws

UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box

A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill

Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data

New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes

Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm

The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society

Common myths about copyright online

Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?

Big boost to gaming

Is your product “AI powered”?

The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right

Space Law in New Zealand

You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law

Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right

Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging

One Act to Rule Them All

A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS

Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020

NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched

Are you being unfair?

A new Companies Office levy is one step closer

Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?

From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners

Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force

Paying the price for getting privacy wrong

Can AI be an inventor?

Finfluencer Crackdown

TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch

Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'

Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do

The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t

Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)

The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships

Building Blocks of Trust

Firm News | Legal Rankings

Buy Now, Regulate Soon

Ten simple things

Funding the Future

Cyber Security for Start-ups

Fit for purchase

The Screen Industry Workers Bill

UK/New Zealand Trade Deal Takes Flight

Palmer v Alalääkkölä

Other articles you
might like

From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business
1
May 2026

The Broadcasting Standards Authority has concluded it has jurisdiction over an online media outlet that livestreams to New Zealand audiences.

Angela Yang

Solicitor

New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know
5
March 2026

The new Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code tightens expectations on health and therapeutic claims, especially in digital advertising.

Kyra Vince

Special Counsel – Knowledge

New Zealand may ban social media for young users
23
May 2025

A new Members' bill would ban some social media for users under 16 years old.

Anchali Anandanayagam

Partner