The Screen Industry Workers Bill
The Screen Industry Workers Bill (SIWB) will replace the Employment Relations (Film Production Work) Amendment Act 2010 (better known as the Hobbit Law).

The Screen Industry Workers Bill (SIWB) will replace the Employment Relations (Film Production Work) Amendment Act 2010 (better known as the Hobbit Law).
The Hobbit Law was notoriously passed under urgency following the supreme court finding of Bryson v Three Foot Six Limited [2005] NZSC6. This case found that Bryson, who was working for Three Foot Six Limited (a company hired to make models for The Lord of the Rings), was in fact an “employee” and not an “independent contractor”. This was significant as it raised the possibility that all film workers, who were historically understood to be, and treated as, independent contractors, may now fall under the category of an employee. As employees, film workers would be entitled to all the rights granted under the Employment Relations Act 2000.
This opened the door for an entire industry of workers to claim these benefits, for example entitlements to holiday and sick leave. The introduction of the Hobbit Law effectively reversed this decision specifically amending the Employment Relations Act to exclude film and video game workers (film workers) from being considered employees. Film workers have since formally been considered independent contractors (unless they have an individual employment contract in place). The Hobbit Law was backed by high profile film industry members including Peter Jackson (hence the nickname), one of the reasons for this being that overseas (and local) film production companies would be put off from working in New Zealand if they have the added costs and expectations of complying with the Employment Relations Act.
So, what now?
The SIWB will replace the existing Hobbit Law. This SIWB will now apply to all screen workers (being television, film and computer-generated game workers) and will make three main changes:
- Introduce the ability to collectively bargain;
- specifically provide screen workers with protection against bullying and harassment; and
- outline the contracting rights of individuals.
Collective Bargaining:
The SIWB introduces the ability for Screen Production Workers to collectively bargain for a minimum standard contract. Collective bargaining is something which contractors are typically prevented from doing under Commerce Act in order to prevent restrictive trade practices.
To manage the collective bargaining process, contracts are split into three tiers to be negotiated:
- Occupational Level Contracts which are negotiated on behalf of a specified occupation group by representatives (union/ guild) and creates a minimum standard for all production companies to comply with when they engage this occupation group in future;
- Enterprise Collective Contracts which will relate to a specific production company’s (engager) ongoing contracts with an occupation group when they work for that engager; and
- Individual Contracts which individuals can negotiate with the production company.
Representatives from the industry (i.e. unions and guilds) can be nominated when the majority of the industry group consent, to negotiate occupation and enterprise level contracts with the engagers on behalf of their industry group. This negotiation will produce a collective contract which creates the minimum standard for contractors to enter into agreements with that employer, regardless of whether they personally are a member of that collective group (union or guild).
The tier system for the negotiations means that the Occupation Level contract will create a minimum standard which cannot be contracted out of, the Enterprise Level contract must negotiate above the terms of the Occupation Level contract, and also cannot be negotiated out of, and an Individual Contract must meet at least the minimum standards of both the Occupation and Enterprise level contracts if they are in place. Contractors continue to have the ability to negotiate their own terms within their Individual Contract, above the collectively negotiated minimum, but cannot negotiate below these terms.
Bullying and Harassment:
The SIWB introduces mandatory requirements to prevent harassment and bullying in the industry. This includes that a contract cannot prevent claims of bullying and harassment being raised, the contract must contain, in plain language, the process for how bullying and harassment claims will be managed, and that the complainant cannot have their contract terminated as a consequence for bringing a bullying or harassment claim.
Contracting terms:
The SIWB also introduces other contractual rights of individuals including that each screen production worker must be provided with their own contract, have the opportunity to obtain advice on this and have any concerns responded to in good faith. The contract must also provide an avenue to resolve disputes. The contract cannot be inconsistent with the SIWB and the SIWB cannot be contracted out of. A screen worker can also not be discriminated against for choosing to be, or not to be, a member of a collective group such as a union or a guild.
When does the Bill become law?
While this Bill is not the repeal of Hobbit law that many in the industry had called for, it does create new rights and requirements for employment relations with screen workers, which as contractors, screen workers were not previously able to access. The Bill is currently in its second reading, from here, it will go through the Committee of the Whole House, Third Reading and finally the Royal assent. The Bill had been expected to come into force this year, however the current circumstances mean that the introduction has been delayed. We anticipate the Bill will likely come into effect mid-2022. You can track its progress and read the Bill here.
If you have any questions regarding the Bill, or any questions relating to media projects please don’t hesitate to get in touch with myself or Anchali.
Services in this insight
Modern slavery regulation on the way – Is your business ready?
From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business
Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground
Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand
The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships
New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know
OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now
AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI
New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know
Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia
Consumer law update 2025
Open banking launches in New Zealand
Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act
Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta
Open banking almost live
Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act
Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand
Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand
Open banking regulations released for consultation
Ten tips for buy-side M&A success
A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?
Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)
Important changes made to the Privacy Act
New Zealand may ban social media for young users
Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way
Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet
Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media
Security guidance released for emerging tech companies
Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back
Consumer law update 2024
New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go
The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”
New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour
WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted
Doing business in the Middle East
AI and advertising – What producers need to know
Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs
Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?
Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year
Is End-to-End to end?
Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement
Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released
Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?
Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?
Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation
The copyright conundrum with generative AI
Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools
Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?
Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament
New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline
The long and winding road to royalties
Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal
EU gets closer to AI laws
UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box
A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill
Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data
New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes
Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm
The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society
Common myths about copyright online
Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?
Big boost to gaming
Is your product “AI powered”?
The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right
Space Law in New Zealand
You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law
Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right
Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging
One Act to Rule Them All
A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS
Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020
NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched
Are you being unfair?
Are you legal?
Power Up 2022
A new Companies Office levy is one step closer
Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?
From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners
I'm back, baby
Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force
Paying the price for getting privacy wrong
Can AI be an inventor?
Finfluencer Crackdown
TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch
Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'
Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do
The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t
Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)
The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships
Building Blocks of Trust
Firm News | Legal Rankings
Buy Now, Regulate Soon
Ten simple things
Funding the Future
Cyber Security for Start-ups
Fit for purchase
The Screen Industry Workers Bill
UK/New Zealand Trade Deal Takes Flight
Other articles you
might like
The Broadcasting Standards Authority has concluded it has jurisdiction over an online media outlet that livestreams to New Zealand audiences.
The new Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code tightens expectations on health and therapeutic claims, especially in digital advertising.
A new Members' bill would ban some social media for users under 16 years old.











.jpg)

.jpg)