The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t

The copyright may be worth millions, but the book itself? Not so much…

The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’tThe Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t
Category
Insight | IP
Insight
|
IP
Published Date
1
February 2022
Reading Time

What happens when the latest crypto craze, the “greatest movie never made”, and a misunderstanding of copyright law come together? A group of netizens pays €2.6 million for a book worth roughly €30,000, that’s what!

Earlier this month, a collective of pseudo-anonymous sci-fi fans and blockchain enthusiasts calling themselves “SpiceDAO” dropped a ridiculous amount of mostly crowd-sourced money on a copy of a very rare, and very influential book – a tome containing concept art, production ideas, a complete script, and full storyboard for Alejandro Jodorowsky’s big-screen adaptation of Frank Herbert’s 1965 sci-fi novel, Dune. The book was one of about 20 published in 1975 that were passed around Hollywood to try and pique the interest of movie studios with the aim of getting the film green-lit. Unfortunately, its particular vision of a Dune movie was never produced, but the book itself was a sensation among the movie-producing classes. Its style and scope shaped sci-fi cinema for decades, heavily influencing films like Star Wars and Alien. When you consider that its contributors included H.R. Geiger, Salvador Dali and Pink Floyd, you can see why it caused such a stir!

When it was announced that a copy of the book had surfaced, and was going across the block at Christie’s auction house, SpiceDAO (“Spice” for the substance that drives the narrative in Dune, and DAO for “Decentralised Autonomous Organisation”) set about gaining followers and collecting money from them with the aim of purchasing the book. Their ultimate goals were to “collectively explore options to digitally preserve the manuscript, make it accessible to the public for the very first time, and develop creative projects inspired by the vision Jodorowsky set forth.” Reading further into their website, it looks like they intended to digitise the book, create NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) from the images, make the digitised book public, burn the physical copy (actually! – you can read about it here), then make adaptations like animated films and comics based on it.

Services in this insight

Intellectual Property

Identify, protect and enforce your intellectual property so you can grow with confidence.

Services in this insight

Intellectual Property

Identify, protect and enforce your intellectual property so you can grow with confidence.

Services in this insight

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore.

Intellectual Property

Identify, protect and enforce your intellectual property so you can grow with confidence.

Previous Article
Next Article

From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business

Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground

Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand

The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships

New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code

IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know

OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now

AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI

New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know

Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia

Consumer law update 2025

Open banking launches in New Zealand

Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act

Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta

Open banking almost live

Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act

Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand

Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand

Open banking regulations released for consultation

Ten tips for buy-side M&A success

A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?

Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)

Important changes made to the Privacy Act

New Zealand may ban social media for young users

Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way

Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet

Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media

Security guidance released for emerging tech companies

Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back

Consumer law update 2024

New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go

The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”

New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour

WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted

Doing business in the Middle East

AI and advertising – What producers need to know

Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs

Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?

Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code

Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year

Is End-to-End to end?

Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement

Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released

Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?

Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?

Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation

The copyright conundrum with generative AI

Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools

Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?

Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament

New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline

The long and winding road to royalties

Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal

EU gets closer to AI laws

UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box

A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill

Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data

New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes

Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm

The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society

Common myths about copyright online

Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?

Big boost to gaming

Is your product “AI powered”?

The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right

Space Law in New Zealand

You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law

Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right

Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging

One Act to Rule Them All

A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS

Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020

NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched

Are you being unfair?

A new Companies Office levy is one step closer

Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?

From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners

Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force

Paying the price for getting privacy wrong

Can AI be an inventor?

Finfluencer Crackdown

TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch

Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'

Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do

The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t

Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)

The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships

Building Blocks of Trust

Firm News | Legal Rankings

Buy Now, Regulate Soon

Ten simple things

Funding the Future

Cyber Security for Start-ups

Fit for purchase

The Screen Industry Workers Bill

UK/New Zealand Trade Deal Takes Flight

Palmer v Alalääkkölä

Other articles you
might like

Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia
22
December 2025

A recent Court of Appeal decision provides long awaited clarity for businesses on the lawful use of another party’s trade mark in New Zealand.

Caitlin Hadlee

Special Counsel

Ellie Ryan

Senior Associate

Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta
13
November 2025

Two contrasting court judgments have been released on whether it is legal to train LLMs using copyright protected works.

Caitlin Hadlee

Special Counsel

Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act
5
September 2025

The EU Data Act is about to change how Kiwi firms handle customer data.

Edwin Lim

Partner

Kyra Vince

Special Counsel – Knowledge