To have and to hold

Planning or providing goods and services for a wedding this coming season? Here are some things to consider.

To have and to holdTo have and to hold
Category
Insight | General
Insight
|
General
Published Date
10
August 2020
Reading Time

Marica Frost, one of our entrepreneur clients, operates The Curator, a platform that helps couples about to tie the knot connect with some of the best wedding vendors in New Zealand. Marica reached out to us to provide some tips to members who might be planning weddings in this uncertain COVID-19 environment. Here's what we had to say (originally sent as a newsletter to members of The Curator).

The COVID-19 pandemic has had an immense impact on the provision of goods and services fundamental to event planning. With the resurgence of cases both here and in Australia, the uncertainty and unpredictability will be our ‘normal’ for some time yet. In this article we look at some of the issues you should consider if planning, or providing goods or services, for a wedding, this coming season in the COVID-19 environment.

The importance of a contract

Various issues have arisen during the recent lockdown where events, such as weddings, had to be cancelled. For example, can a customer receive a refund of a deposit paid to a vendor for services not provided? What are a vendor’s rights if a customer cancels their wedding because their wedding venue closed down? These, and a lot of other scenarios, probably weren’t contemplated at the time the parties entered into a contract (assuming one was entered in the first place).

Moving forward, now that everyone’s aware of the challenges faced in the COVID-19 environment, it’s a good idea to have a contract in place that addresses certain issues. For example, if a wedding is cancelled because of another forced lockdown, can a customer receive a refund of deposits paid for catering, venue hire, florists etc? Will a vendor be liable if it cannot provide its services?

We discuss some of these issues below.

Include a force majeure clause

The contract could include a force majeure provision that addresses the situation where you (or the other party to the contract) cannot perform certain obligations (e.g. provide goods or services, or provide access to a venue) due to an event outside of the party’s control.

A force majeure provision typically states that the affected party is not liable to the other party for its non-performance of the contract, or a delay in the performance of its obligations, due to a ‘force majeure event’ occurring.  

A ‘force majeure event’ is typically an event beyond the control of a party, including acts of God (e.g. earthquake, fire, flood, tsunami), war and strikes. These events are usually specified in the contract as ‘force majeure events’.

Before Covid-19, pandemics or epidemics, and government intervention, would sometimes be included as force majeure events. However, in today’s environment it’s particularly important to specify these latter events as ‘force majeure events’ with an express acknowledgement that Covid-19 is included in the definition of ‘pandemic or epidemic’.

For example, a customer might arrange to get married in one of the Pacific Islands if a ‘travel bubble’ is implemented. That customer might arrange for their photographer to fly to the Pacific Island to shoot the wedding. The photographer is set to fly out but the relevant Government of the Pacific Island imposes (at short notice) a mandatory quarantine period because COVID-19 has crept in. This makes it impossible for the photographer to carry out the services. If the contract has an adequate force majeure provision then that photographer would not be liable to the customer for failing to provide its services.

The flip-side of this is that the customer probably won’t have to pay the photographer if the force majeure event also applies to them. So if you’re a customer, it’s important to check whether a force majeure clause in a contract also protects you.

What if there’s no force majeure clause in the contract?

If there’s no force majeure clause in your contract, the contractual principle of frustration may apply.

A contract may be frustrated when it is completely impossible to provide the goods or services that were promised. A contract won’t be frustrated just because the vendor considers it’s too hard or expensive to comply. In the context of COVID-19, a contract may be frustrated if, due to government direction (such as the Level 4 lockdown), it is illegal to provide the goods or services in question.

Frustration is all-or-nothing; a contract cannot be partially frustrated. If an event is postponed, the principle of frustration will not apply as the obligation to provide the goods or services has only been delayed to a later date.

If a contract is frustrated, neither party needs to keep their side of the agreement and any specific terms in the contract that set out the consequences of frustration will apply.

For example, if a customer has contracted a caterer for their wedding and the caterer is no longer legally able to provide the service due to a regional lockdown being put in place, the contract may be frustrated meaning that the caterer will not have to provide the service and the customer will not have to pay.

Dealing with deposits

Recently, there has been a lot of uncertainty as to whether deposits paid by customers to vendors were refundable for services not provided due to the COVID-19 crisis. Some deposits paid by customers may have been agreed to be “non-refundable”, in which case deposits would generally not be refundable. If the contract is frustrated and the terms of the contract do not address whether a deposit is refundable, then under law the customer would be entitled to a refund (less any reasonable expenses incurred by the vendor before the contract is frustrated).

In an effort to avoid disputes, it’s best to address in a contract what will happen to a deposit that has been paid. For example if the vendor is unable to provide services due to the COVID-19 crisis the deposit could be:

  • stated to be non-refundable;
  • stated to be refundable if a force majeure or other specified event occurs, or the contract is frustrated; or
  • treated as a credit for services that the parties agree to be provided at a later date if a force majeure or other specified event occurs, or the contract is frustrated.

If you’re a vendor, when deposits are received it’s good practice (if possible) to put that money aside until you have performed the services. That way, if a deposit needs to be refunded you will have those funds available rather than trying to find the money for a refund if the deposit’s already been spent.

How have you managed your liability to third parties?

If you’re a vendor, and you provide goods or services to customers for which you use sub-contractors, it’s important to make sure you manage your liabilities carefully. It’s a good idea to have a clause in your sub-contracts that only require you to pay your sub-contractors once the relevant customer pays you.

This is especially important at the moment, as another mandated lockdown could mean that you’re in a position where you cannot provide the goods or services to a customer who does not have to pay you, but you still have to pay your sub-contractors.

Another consideration is whether you have contracted to provide services in your personal capacity or in the name of your company. If you have contracted in your personal capacity and a customer makes a claim against you, then you are personally liable if something goes wrong. This means your personal assets such as your home or car (if owned by you) could be at risk. Contracting under a company name will usually mean your liability is limited to just the assets that are owned by the company, providing you with more protection.

Happy days ahead

These are difficult times for vendors and customers, but parties should work together to agree what will happen if a wedding is cancelled or postponed because of COVID-19. A contract should deal with disruptions to the wedding due to events outside of the parties’ control. Vendors and customers should treat each other fairly – although vendors may risk backlash or negative reviews if they don’t provide a refund or credit for cancelled weddings, customers should also understand the impact that any cancellation may have on the livelihood of vendors.

This article was co-authored with Josie Desmond.

Social media image credit: Marc A Sporys

Services in this insight

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.

Services in this insight

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.

Services in this insight

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore.

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.
Previous Article
Next Article

Consultation opens on New Zealand's payment services regulation

Modern slavery regulation on the way – Is your business ready?

From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business

Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground

Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand

The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships

New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code

IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know

OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now

AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI

New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know

Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia

Consumer law update 2025

Open banking launches in New Zealand

Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act

Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta

Open banking almost live

Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act

Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand

Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand

Open banking regulations released for consultation

Ten tips for buy-side M&A success

A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?

Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)

Important changes made to the Privacy Act

New Zealand may ban social media for young users

Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way

Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet

Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media

Security guidance released for emerging tech companies

Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back

Consumer law update 2024

New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go

The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”

New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour

WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted

Doing business in the Middle East

AI and advertising – What producers need to know

Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs

Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?

Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code

Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year

Is End-to-End to end?

Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement

Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released

Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?

Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?

Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation

The copyright conundrum with generative AI

Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools

Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?

Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament

New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline

The long and winding road to royalties

Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal

EU gets closer to AI laws

UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box

A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill

Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data

New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes

Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm

The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society

Common myths about copyright online

Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?

Big boost to gaming

Is your product “AI powered”?

The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right

Space Law in New Zealand

You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law

Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right

Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging

One Act to Rule Them All

A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS

Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020

NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched

Are you being unfair?

A new Companies Office levy is one step closer

Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?

From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners

Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force

Paying the price for getting privacy wrong

Can AI be an inventor?

Finfluencer Crackdown

TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch

Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'

Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do

The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t

Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)

The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships

Building Blocks of Trust

Firm News | Legal Rankings

Buy Now, Regulate Soon

Ten simple things

Funding the Future

Cyber Security for Start-ups

Fit for purchase

The Screen Industry Workers Bill

Other articles you
might like

Modern slavery regulation on the way – Is your business ready?
6
May 2026

New modern slavery legislation is progressing through Parliament and is now open for public consultation.

Luiz Buck

Luiz Buck

Senior Associate

Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground
28
April 2026

Hudson Gavin Martin was delighted to once again author the New Zealand chapter of Lexology In Depth: Space Law.

Lisa Paz

Lisa Paz

Senior Associate

Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand
13
April 2026

The Government’s new Cyber Security Strategy 2026–2030 and Action Plan 2026–2027 signal a renewed push to strengthen New Zealand’s resilience to digital threats.

Luiz Buck

Luiz Buck

Senior Associate

Simon Martin

Simon Martin

Partner