Working From Home – not just an employment issue
If you're currently working through implementing urgent measures to continue providing services from home, here are a few tips to consider.

With stringent ‘lock-down’ measures in place in New Zealand and around the world to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic, it’s a cliché that working from home is the new normal. While most businesses are working through the implications of this for their employees, many are also considering their key contracts and suppliers. Some will need to implement urgent measures to ensure that people providing their key outsourced functions (like customer services) can continue providing services from home or in a different way.
If this is something that you’re currently working through, here are few things to consider:
Force majeure clauses: These standard clauses (which generally allow contracting parties to avoid their obligations in genuinely unforeseen and unavoidable circumstances) are certainly having their day in the sun. Google the phrase and you’ll be confronted with a long list of articles from law firms about force majeure in a COVID-19 world. However, they are generally a blunt instrument to deal with contractual issues caused by events like pandemics. In the most extreme circumstances they can permit termination of the agreement, but for most outsourcing relationships, early discussion and renegotiation of core areas will be preferable to termination (or long-term non-performance).
Frustration: If there is no force majeure clause in your existing contract, you may still get relief on the basis that your contract has been “frustrated”. Frustration means that the obligations in the contract become impossible to perform because of unforeseen event(s) which are outside of the parties' control. While COVID-19 may create some grounds for frustration, there is a very high threshold required to establish that a contract has been frustrated – so if you want to go down this path, you should explore this with your lawyer.
Navigating existing outsourcing arrangements: If you'd rather keep things moving, then you might have to speak with your suppliers/customers about tweaking your existing arrangements. Ideally, you don't want to completely renegotiate your existing contracts. Instead, you should focus on tackling the key issues that will enable your business to continue as safely as possible during the COVID-19 disruption. To unpick the key issues, you should be asking the following questions:
- Is there any ‘flex’ in your existing outsourcing agreement to facilitate working from home?
- Is this something you can easily build in using the change management clauses?
- If you are a customer making changes that impact or control workers’ behaviour, how do these sit alongside your supplier’s own employee policies? Could you agree that the supplier remains responsible for the actions of its workers and be comfortable that the supplier manages the nuances of that – while retaining core contractual obligations like confidentiality and protection of intellectual property?
- Could you implement activity tracking tools to monitor productive hours in a similar way as would be the case if workers were ‘on-site’? This is particularly important for ‘time & materials’ engagements where customers are paying by the hour or day.
- Are there any other assumptions that you have made about the location of the service or how it will be provided that will need to be addressed? For example, are there any reporting lines that may need to change as personnel work remotely and as team members are side-lined onto other COVID-19 projects?
Cyber Security: Do you need to change or add requirements around cyber security? You may discover that your existing contracts have security requirements that are not feasible for the ordinary person working from home. Could you avoid total shut down by reconsidering the ‘must haves’ and adding other cyber security requirements to give you some comfort? For example:
- requiring workers connect to the internet using either a network cable or a secure password protected Wi-Fi connection;
- requiring that workers do not use public Wi-Fi; and
- requiring workers to log in using a Virtual Private Network (VPN).
Privacy protections: Could you put other pragmatic privacy protections in place to reduce the risks? For example:
- requiring the use of privacy screens;
- requiring workers to lock their computer when not in use;
- requiring workers to have sensitive discussions away from other members of the household; and/or
- generally reminding workers of their confidentiality obligations.
Liability: Parties may want to review liability caps in outsourcing or services agreements to reflect the increased risk of a confidentiality or privacy breach. Suppliers and customers will probably have differing views on what the results of these reviews should be, so implementing practical measures to reduce risk and considering the underlying insurance position may help both suppliers and customers to get comfortable with their respective liability positions.
Duration: How long should these new measures last? Do you want a quick and easy mechanism to restore the previous contractual position once lock-down measures are loosened (i.e. the ability to revoke the new clauses on notice)? If so, this should also allow for the possibility that lock-down measures will be re-implemented later on.
As business continues during COVID-19, you’ll also need to consider what measures are appropriate when agreeing new contracts. Tweaking a template force majeure clause to include “pandemics” is unlikely to cut it. COVID-19 is now a known quantity, and the best agreements in this new world will consider and reflect its impact with as much detail and clarity as possible.
For more information on these topics or help with anything else during these unprecedented events, please feel free to get in touch.
Services in this insight
Fair Trading Act changes will increase governance risk for business
New Zealand’s online gambling laws get a shake up
Consultation opens on New Zealand's payment services regulation
Modern slavery regulation on the way – Is your business ready?
From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business
Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground
Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand
The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships
New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know
OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now
AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI
New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know
Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia
Consumer law update 2025
Open banking launches in New Zealand
Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act
Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta
Open banking almost live
Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act
Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand
Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand
Open banking regulations released for consultation
Ten tips for buy-side M&A success
A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?
Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)
Important changes made to the Privacy Act
New Zealand may ban social media for young users
Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way
Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet
Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media
Security guidance released for emerging tech companies
Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back
Consumer law update 2024
New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go
The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”
New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour
WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted
Doing business in the Middle East
AI and advertising – What producers need to know
Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs
Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?
Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year
Is End-to-End to end?
Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement
Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released
Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?
Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?
Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation
The copyright conundrum with generative AI
Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools
Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?
Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament
New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline
The long and winding road to royalties
Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal
EU gets closer to AI laws
UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box
A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill
Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data
New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes
Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm
The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society
Common myths about copyright online
Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?
Big boost to gaming
Is your product “AI powered”?
The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right
Space Law in New Zealand
You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law
Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right
Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging
One Act to Rule Them All
A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS
Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020
NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched
Are you being unfair?
Are you legal?
Power Up 2022
A new Companies Office levy is one step closer
Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?
From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners
I'm back, baby
Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force
Paying the price for getting privacy wrong
Can AI be an inventor?
Finfluencer Crackdown
TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch
Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'
Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do
The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t
Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)
The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships
Building Blocks of Trust
Firm News | Legal Rankings
Buy Now, Regulate Soon
Ten simple things
Funding the Future
Cyber Security for Start-ups
Other articles you
might like
Part 1 in our series on proposed reforms to New Zealand's Fair Trading Act.
New modern slavery legislation is progressing through Parliament and is now open for public consultation.
Hudson Gavin Martin was delighted to once again author the New Zealand chapter of Lexology In Depth: Space Law.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)









