Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020
The Ministry of Justice is inviting feedback on the proposal to amend the Privacy Act 2020 to broaden notification requirements for agencies that collect personal information indirectly.

The Ministry of Justice (Ministry) is inviting feedback on a proposal to amend the Privacy Act 2020 (Privacy Act) to broaden the notification requirements in the Privacy Act to also cover entities / agencies that collect personal information indirectly. If the Ministry proceeds with recommending these changes and the Privacy Act is amended as a result, it will be first major amendment to the Privacy Act since it came into effect nearly two years ago and will likely bring New Zealand in line with similar jurisdictions. Depending on the nature of the changes, they could also result in increased compliance costs for businesses.
What is suggested?
Under the Privacy Act, agencies are required (subject to limited exceptions) to collect information directly from the individuals concerned and to notify those individuals of, among other things, the purpose of collection and how their information will be used and disclosed when their personal information is collected directly from them.
The Ministry has identified a gap in the legislation where agencies indirectly collect personal information, but do not need to notify individuals. For example, if an individual provides personal information via a website, that website may (if the terms and conditions allow) share that personal information with another agency. Because that other agency did not collect the personal information directly then it is not currently required under the Privacy Act to notify the individual of, for example, the fact that the information is being collected and the purpose of collection. While the information (provided it is information about a New Zealand data subject) would still be subject to many of the protections in the Privacy Act, this gap could result in individuals not being able to exercise their full privacy rights (e.g. seeking access to and correction of their personal information).
The Ministry notes that a number of like-minded jurisdictions, like Australia and the United Kingdom, already have broad notification requirements. Crucially, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union provides that individuals should be clearly informed when their personal information is processed – regardless of whether that information is collected directly from individuals or indirectly.
The Ministry is considering the ways in which the notification requirements under the Privacy Act may be extended. Three specific changes under consideration are:
- Amending the Privacy Act so that the notification requirements apply where an agency collects personal information whether directly or indirectly from other sources.
- Amending the Privacy Act so that the individuals are to notified whenever their personal information is disclosed to a third party (regardless of whether the disclosure is authorised); or to narrow the exceptions provided in the Privacy Act to the direct collection requirement.
- Introducing a new Information Privacy Principle (in addition to the existing 13 principles) that would specifically deal with notification of indirect collection.
If the Privacy Act is amended in this way, then it will likely result in increased compliance costs for agencies handling personal information and doing business in New Zealand. The Ministry does suggest that one way of reducing these costs would be confine broader notification requirements to personal information that is collected indirectly from overseas individuals – meaning business operating exclusively in New Zealand should not incur further compliance costs. The Ministry is particularly interested in getting feedback on ways that compliance costs for businesses could be reduced.
The impetus for this change appears to be to align New Zealand data protection laws with those of other jurisdictions that New Zealand has close trading relationships with. It may also be related to our GDPR adequacy status – which permits flows of data from New Zealand to the EU without additional compliance requirements. This status is under constant review by the EU. These changes may also assist New Zealand in retaining this status – ensuring that our digital trade sector is not placed under pressure.
Further information
You can access the Ministry’s consultation document here. We will provide further updates on the consultation process and any resulting amendments to the Privacy Act. The deadline for feedback to the Ministry on the proposals is Friday 30 September 2022.
Services in this insight
Modern slavery regulation on the way – Is your business ready?
From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business
Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground
Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand
The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships
New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know
OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now
AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI
New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know
Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia
Consumer law update 2025
Open banking launches in New Zealand
Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act
Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta
Open banking almost live
Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act
Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand
Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand
Open banking regulations released for consultation
Ten tips for buy-side M&A success
A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?
Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)
Important changes made to the Privacy Act
New Zealand may ban social media for young users
Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way
Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet
Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media
Security guidance released for emerging tech companies
Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back
Consumer law update 2024
New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go
The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”
New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour
WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted
Doing business in the Middle East
AI and advertising – What producers need to know
Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs
Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?
Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year
Is End-to-End to end?
Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement
Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released
Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?
Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?
Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation
The copyright conundrum with generative AI
Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools
Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?
Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament
New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline
The long and winding road to royalties
Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal
EU gets closer to AI laws
UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box
A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill
Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data
New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes
Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm
The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society
Common myths about copyright online
Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?
Big boost to gaming
Is your product “AI powered”?
The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right
Space Law in New Zealand
You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law
Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right
Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging
One Act to Rule Them All
A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS
Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020
NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched
Are you being unfair?
Are you legal?
Power Up 2022
A new Companies Office levy is one step closer
Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?
From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners
I'm back, baby
Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force
Paying the price for getting privacy wrong
Can AI be an inventor?
Finfluencer Crackdown
TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch
Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'
Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do
The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t
Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)
The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships
Building Blocks of Trust
Firm News | Legal Rankings
Buy Now, Regulate Soon
Ten simple things
Funding the Future
Cyber Security for Start-ups
Fit for purchase
The Screen Industry Workers Bill
UK/New Zealand Trade Deal Takes Flight
Other articles you
might like
New modern slavery legislation is progressing through Parliament and is now open for public consultation.
Hudson Gavin Martin was delighted to once again author the New Zealand chapter of Lexology In Depth: Space Law.
The Government’s new Cyber Security Strategy 2026–2030 and Action Plan 2026–2027 signal a renewed push to strengthen New Zealand’s resilience to digital threats.













