Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand

New Zealand's product labelling requirements will be reviewed to simplify compliance while maintaining high consumer protection standards.

Product labelling changes flagged for New ZealandProduct labelling changes flagged for New Zealand
Category
Insight | General
Insight
|
General
Published Date
27
August 2025
Reading Time

The Government has announced a significant review of New Zealand’s product labelling requirements. The review has the potential to reshape the current regulatory environment – with a stated focus to simplify compliance for businesses and continuing to follow high consumer protection standards.

Current regulatory approach

There are several product labelling requirements in New Zealand – currently 30 separate codes, standards and regulations that vary product by product. For example:

• cosmetic and personal product labels must include all ingredients used in the products (with any allergens or hazardous substances being clearly highlighted);

• some classes of therapeutic products, labels must include at least the active and inactive ingredients, storage instructions and any warning or advisory statements;

• new clothes must include written care instructions (such as, washing, drying and ironing information) and fibre content details; and

• some goods, such as children’s nightwear and toys, must comply with strict labelling regulations that are aimed at preventing and reducing the chance of accident or injury when using those goods.

Potential changes

The Government has expressed concern that New Zealand’s current labelling regime is too complex. The legislative framework associated with some codes means they do not always reflect current international practice. The review will consider how New Zealand’s labelling regime can more consistently reflect good international practice and harmonise with New Zealand’s trading partners.

While there is similarity in relation to some goods, there is some growing divergence. For example, New Zealand and Australia’s clothing care labelling requirements used to be largely the same. However, recent regulatory changes in Australia mean that suppliers and manufacturers of new clothing products there must always include care symbols on labels (and written instructions are optional). New Zealand takes the reverse position – new clothing labels must always include written instructions (and use of care symbols is optional). This subtle difference means that suppliers and manufacturers are required to have different labels on new clothing products when exporting into New Zealand. This could have the effect of increasing the cost of the goods as businesses pass on the regulatory compliance costs to consumers.

There is also interest in whether new labelling methods can be adopted. Rather than relying on physical labels, other countries are increasingly moving towards digitally enabled solutions (such as the use of QR codes on products). This allows labels and use instructions to be more easily tailored to different markets and updated as needed. Use of QR codes in New Zealand would be an interesting and positive development, but any implementation would need to ensure it protects the right of all consumers (even the less technologically aware) to clearly know what is in the product they are purchasing and using.

Next steps

The Government is currently working with business and consumer groups to identify common issues and shape the review’s terms of reference. The review is expected to be completed by December 2025.

We will continue to keep you updated on any regulatory changes that result from the review.

Services in this insight

Regulatory Advice

Innovate and grow without tripping over compliance.

Trade Marks & Branding

Clear, practical advice on trade mark clearance, registration, labelling and Food Code compliance.

Services in this insight

Regulatory Advice

Innovate and grow without tripping over compliance.

Trade Marks & Branding

Clear, practical advice on trade mark clearance, registration, labelling and Food Code compliance.

Services in this insight

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore.

Regulatory Advice

Innovate and grow without tripping over compliance.

Trade Marks & Branding

Clear, practical advice on trade mark clearance, registration, labelling and Food Code compliance.

Previous Article
Next Article

From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business

Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground

Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand

The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships

New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code

IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know

OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now

AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI

New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know

Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia

Consumer law update 2025

Open banking launches in New Zealand

Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act

Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta

Open banking almost live

Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act

Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand

Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand

Open banking regulations released for consultation

Ten tips for buy-side M&A success

A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?

Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)

Important changes made to the Privacy Act

New Zealand may ban social media for young users

Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way

Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet

Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media

Security guidance released for emerging tech companies

Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back

Consumer law update 2024

New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go

The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”

New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour

WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted

Doing business in the Middle East

AI and advertising – What producers need to know

Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs

Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?

Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code

Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year

Is End-to-End to end?

Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement

Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released

Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?

Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?

Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation

The copyright conundrum with generative AI

Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools

Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?

Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament

New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline

The long and winding road to royalties

Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal

EU gets closer to AI laws

UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box

A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill

Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data

New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes

Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm

The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society

Common myths about copyright online

Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?

Big boost to gaming

Is your product “AI powered”?

The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right

Space Law in New Zealand

You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law

Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right

Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging

One Act to Rule Them All

A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS

Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020

NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched

Are you being unfair?

A new Companies Office levy is one step closer

Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?

From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners

Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force

Paying the price for getting privacy wrong

Can AI be an inventor?

Finfluencer Crackdown

TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch

Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'

Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do

The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t

Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)

The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships

Building Blocks of Trust

Firm News | Legal Rankings

Buy Now, Regulate Soon

Ten simple things

Funding the Future

Cyber Security for Start-ups

Fit for purchase

The Screen Industry Workers Bill

UK/New Zealand Trade Deal Takes Flight

Palmer v Alalääkkölä

Other articles you
might like

Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground
28
April 2026

Hudson Gavin Martin was delighted to once again author the New Zealand chapter of Lexology In Depth: Space Law.

Lisa Paz

Senior Associate

Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand
13
April 2026

The Government’s new Cyber Security Strategy 2026–2030 and Action Plan 2026–2027 signal a renewed push to strengthen New Zealand’s resilience to digital threats.

Luiz Buck

Senior Associate

Simon Martin

Partner

IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know
31
March 2026

IPP3A is almost here, and agencies that collect personal information indirectly need to prepare.

Kyra Vince

Special Counsel – Knowledge

Anchali Anandanayagam

Partner