Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand
New Zealand's product labelling requirements will be reviewed to simplify compliance while maintaining high consumer protection standards.
.jpg)
The Government has announced a significant review of New Zealand’s product labelling requirements. The review has the potential to reshape the current regulatory environment – with a stated focus to simplify compliance for businesses and continuing to follow high consumer protection standards.
Current regulatory approach
There are several product labelling requirements in New Zealand – currently 30 separate codes, standards and regulations that vary product by product. For example:
• cosmetic and personal product labels must include all ingredients used in the products (with any allergens or hazardous substances being clearly highlighted);
• some classes of therapeutic products, labels must include at least the active and inactive ingredients, storage instructions and any warning or advisory statements;
• new clothes must include written care instructions (such as, washing, drying and ironing information) and fibre content details; and
• some goods, such as children’s nightwear and toys, must comply with strict labelling regulations that are aimed at preventing and reducing the chance of accident or injury when using those goods.
Potential changes
The Government has expressed concern that New Zealand’s current labelling regime is too complex. The legislative framework associated with some codes means they do not always reflect current international practice. The review will consider how New Zealand’s labelling regime can more consistently reflect good international practice and harmonise with New Zealand’s trading partners.
While there is similarity in relation to some goods, there is some growing divergence. For example, New Zealand and Australia’s clothing care labelling requirements used to be largely the same. However, recent regulatory changes in Australia mean that suppliers and manufacturers of new clothing products there must always include care symbols on labels (and written instructions are optional). New Zealand takes the reverse position – new clothing labels must always include written instructions (and use of care symbols is optional). This subtle difference means that suppliers and manufacturers are required to have different labels on new clothing products when exporting into New Zealand. This could have the effect of increasing the cost of the goods as businesses pass on the regulatory compliance costs to consumers.
There is also interest in whether new labelling methods can be adopted. Rather than relying on physical labels, other countries are increasingly moving towards digitally enabled solutions (such as the use of QR codes on products). This allows labels and use instructions to be more easily tailored to different markets and updated as needed. Use of QR codes in New Zealand would be an interesting and positive development, but any implementation would need to ensure it protects the right of all consumers (even the less technologically aware) to clearly know what is in the product they are purchasing and using.
Next steps
The Government is currently working with business and consumer groups to identify common issues and shape the review’s terms of reference. The review is expected to be completed by December 2025.
We will continue to keep you updated on any regulatory changes that result from the review.
Services in this insight
From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business
Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground
Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand
The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships
New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know
OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now
AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI
New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know
Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia
Consumer law update 2025
Open banking launches in New Zealand
Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act
Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta
Open banking almost live
Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act
Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand
Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand
Open banking regulations released for consultation
Ten tips for buy-side M&A success
A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?
Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)
Important changes made to the Privacy Act
New Zealand may ban social media for young users
Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way
Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet
Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media
Security guidance released for emerging tech companies
Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back
Consumer law update 2024
New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go
The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”
New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour
WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted
Doing business in the Middle East
AI and advertising – What producers need to know
Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs
Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?
Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year
Is End-to-End to end?
Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement
Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released
Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?
Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?
Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation
The copyright conundrum with generative AI
Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools
Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?
Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament
New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline
The long and winding road to royalties
Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal
EU gets closer to AI laws
UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box
A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill
Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data
New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes
Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm
The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society
Common myths about copyright online
Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?
Big boost to gaming
Is your product “AI powered”?
The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right
Space Law in New Zealand
You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law
Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right
Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging
One Act to Rule Them All
A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS
Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020
NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched
Are you being unfair?
Are you legal?
Power Up 2022
A new Companies Office levy is one step closer
Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?
From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners
I'm back, baby
Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force
Paying the price for getting privacy wrong
Can AI be an inventor?
Finfluencer Crackdown
TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch
Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'
Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do
The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t
Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)
The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships
Building Blocks of Trust
Firm News | Legal Rankings
Buy Now, Regulate Soon
Ten simple things
Funding the Future
Cyber Security for Start-ups
Fit for purchase
The Screen Industry Workers Bill
UK/New Zealand Trade Deal Takes Flight
Palmer v Alalääkkölä
Other articles you
might like
Hudson Gavin Martin was delighted to once again author the New Zealand chapter of Lexology In Depth: Space Law.
The Government’s new Cyber Security Strategy 2026–2030 and Action Plan 2026–2027 signal a renewed push to strengthen New Zealand’s resilience to digital threats.
IPP3A is almost here, and agencies that collect personal information indirectly need to prepare.







.jpg)







