New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know
The new Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code tightens expectations on health and therapeutic claims, especially in digital advertising.
.jpg)
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has released its updated Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code, with rules that will apply to new advertising from 1 April 2026 and to all therapeutic and health advertising from 1 July 2026.
For businesses operating in health, wellness and “better-for-you” products or services, this is not just a technical tidy‑up – it tightens expectations around claims, evidence and how you communicate with consumers across increasingly digital channels.
What does the Code cover?
The Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code applies to “all words, visual depictions and conveyed context” when advertising:
• Medicines and medical devices;
• Natural health products and dietary supplements;
• Health services; and
• Any advertising that makes a therapeutic purpose or health claim (even if the product or service is not regulated as a medicine).
The Code doesn’t apply to labels or packaging unless a label or packaging appears in an advertisement, in which case any visible aspects of the label or packaging are covered by the Code.
The Code operates alongside existing legislation, including the Medicines Act 1981 and the Dietary Supplements Regulations 1985, which still set the baseline rules for supply and promotion of many therapeutic products.
What’s different with the updated Code?
The updated Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code keeps the same overall scope and intent as the existing Code, but it tightens the rules and modernises how they apply, especially online. The main differences are around language, vulnerable audiences, testimonials and user‑generated content, mandatory information, and expectations for substantiation and digital channels.
Structure and language
• The new Code is in the same format as other recently reviewed ASA Codes and is intended to be “fit for purpose for use in 2026 and beyond” (ASA Codes Committee Report on the Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code Review – November 2025).
• Wording is made more direct and mandatory – for example, shifting “should/shall” to “must” in key provisions, aligning with other ASA Codes.
Vulnerable audiences
• The concept of “vulnerable audiences” is expanded and clarified.
• Vulnerability now expressly includes mental and physical wellbeing and situational vulnerability (such as bereavement, financial stress, limited health literacy, age or social isolation).
• The new Code specifically targets advertising that promotes inappropriate urgency to purchase, unrealistic body image, or exploits emotional vulnerability, which was less explicit previously.
Testimonials, endorsements and user‑generated content
• The updated Code provides clearer, more detailed rules for testimonials and endorsements, including user‑generated content and third‑party endorsements.
• It reinforces compliance with the Medicines Act (for example, section 58 restrictions on therapeutic testimonials and the continuing prohibition on consumer testimonials in direct‑to‑consumer prescription medicine advertising).
• User‑generated comments and reviews on channels the advertiser controls are explicitly treated as part of the advertisement, making advertisers responsible for moderating or removing non‑compliant therapeutic claims.
Mandatory information and presentation
• Prescriptive mandatory information wording that used to sit in the Code is removed in the update; advertisers must now look to Medsafe and relevant industry codes for the exact wording.
• The new Code instead focuses on how mandatory information is presented: it must be legible, audible and delivered in a manner consumers can understand. QR codes or links are an extra access point for further detail, but do not replace the need to include all required information within the advertisement itself.
Substantiation
• The new Code strengthens expectations that advertisers must hold “sound, relevant, clear and robust” evidence before making therapeutic or health claims. The level of evidence will depend on the type of product or service and the claim being made.
• For medicines and medical devices, therapeutic purpose claims must be consistent with the registered product details (not off‑label claims).
Digital, social and influencer channels
• The substance of the Code continues to apply “in any media”, but the updated version highlights application across digital, social, influencer and traditional channels, and frames influencers as a form of media.
• It makes it clearer that advertisers, agencies, media and influencers share responsibility for the compliance of sponsored and brand‑aligned content.
Transitional and process changes
• The updated Code has staged commencement dates: new advertising must comply from 1 April 2026 and all advertising (including existing campaigns and collateral) from 1 July 2026.
• The review process and Codes Committee Report underline a shift towards using ASA guidance and training (webinars, further guidance notes) to support day‑to‑day application of the Code, with some of the more prescriptive mandatory wording removed.
Potential pressure points
“Wellness” blur and borderline products
The Code does not only catch “hard” therapeutic products – it extends to advertising that makes therapeutic or health claims, including in the rapidly‑growing wellness, lifestyle and “bio‑hacking” space.
This means businesses promoting:
a) Supplements and functional foods;
b) Apps and platforms that promise health benefits; and
c) Wearables, monitoring tools and digital “coaching” services,
will need to think carefully about whether their claims stray into therapeutic territory and, if so, whether the underlying evidence is strong enough.
One important practical point is how easily ordinary marketing language can cross the line into “therapeutic purpose”. For example, promotional copy that moves from “supports general wellbeing” into “treats”, “prevents” or “relieves” a specific condition is more likely under the updated Code to be treated as a therapeutic claim that needs strong evidence and closer alignment with medicines regulation. Advertisers may need to recalibrate the “tone” of their health‑related messaging, not just adjust a few words here and there.
Social media and influencers
The updated Code sits against a backdrop of increased focus on digital advertising standards, including social media and influencer marketing. While the Code itself is not a social‑media‑specific instrument, advertisers should expect that:
• Influencer posts promoting therapeutic or health benefits will be judged under the same lens as traditional advertising.
• Brands will need clear guidelines and monitoring processes for testimonials and user comments that make or repeat therapeutic claims on their channels.
• “Soft” content (for example, wellness tips or routines) can still be treated as advertising if it promotes your products or services.
The operational challenge for advertisers here may be less about writing a compliant script and more about moderating content in real time – particularly for always‑on channels and campaigns that rely heavily on community engagement.
Disclaimers and fine print
The ASA has signalled a stronger emphasis on clear, substantiated claims, and this may mean less tolerance for reliance on disclaimers or qualifications buried in fine print.
Advertisers should prepare for:
• More scrutiny of the quality and relevance of studies or data used to support therapeutic claims.
• Closer attention to overall impression, including imagery – if the headline and visuals promise more than the evidence supports, a footnote is unlikely to save the ad.
• The deterrence of misleading or unsubstantiated claims through financial penalties becoming an increasing focus of regulators generally.
For many clients, this may mean revisiting internal “claim substantiation” playbooks – not just for high‑risk products, but for everyday health‑adjacent messaging.
Next steps for advertisers
1. Map your exposure
• Identify all products, services and channels that involve therapeutic or health‑related advertising.
• Pay particular attention to grey‑area offerings (for example, digital health tools or wellness services) that may not have been treated as “therapeutic” previously.
2. Review your claims and evidence
• Catalogue key claims used across campaigns, packaging and digital content, then match them against the evidence you hold.
• Flag claims that rely heavily on global marketing copy, legacy data or anecdotal support for deeper review. Global materials being localised for New Zealand should be reviewed early, so there is time to negotiate changes with offshore brand owners where needed.
3. Tidy up digital ecosystems
• Audit websites, apps and social channels for older claims that might resurface after 1 July 2026.
• Refresh influencer agreements and guidelines so they reflect the updated Code.
4. Update governance and training
• Ensure marketing, product and legal teams have a shared understanding of the updated Code and where it intersects with other regimes (including the Medicines Act and the Fair Trading Act).
• Build Code considerations into existing sign‑off processes, rather than creating a standalone “bolt‑on”.
5. Plan for complaints and enquiries
• Consider how you will respond if a complaint is raised – who will lead, how quickly you can locate supporting evidence and what your remediation options are.
• For some businesses, engagement with industry training offered by the ASA may be useful.
Hudson Gavin Martin regularly advises clients on advertising, consumer and regulatory issues across health‑adjacent sectors. If you would like to discuss how the updated Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code might affect your business, please get in touch with us.
Services in this insight
From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business
Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground
Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand
The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships
New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know
OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now
AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI
New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know
Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia
Consumer law update 2025
Open banking launches in New Zealand
Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act
Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta
Open banking almost live
Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act
Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand
Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand
Open banking regulations released for consultation
Ten tips for buy-side M&A success
A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?
Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)
Important changes made to the Privacy Act
New Zealand may ban social media for young users
Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way
Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet
Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media
Security guidance released for emerging tech companies
Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back
Consumer law update 2024
New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go
The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”
New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour
WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted
Doing business in the Middle East
AI and advertising – What producers need to know
Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs
Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?
Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year
Is End-to-End to end?
Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement
Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released
Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?
Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?
Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation
The copyright conundrum with generative AI
Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools
Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?
Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament
New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline
The long and winding road to royalties
Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal
EU gets closer to AI laws
UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box
A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill
Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data
New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes
Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm
The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society
Common myths about copyright online
Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?
Big boost to gaming
Is your product “AI powered”?
The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right
Space Law in New Zealand
You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law
Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right
Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging
One Act to Rule Them All
A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS
Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020
NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched
Are you being unfair?
Are you legal?
Power Up 2022
A new Companies Office levy is one step closer
Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?
From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners
I'm back, baby
Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force
Paying the price for getting privacy wrong
Can AI be an inventor?
Finfluencer Crackdown
TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch
Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'
Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do
The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t
Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)
The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships
Building Blocks of Trust
Firm News | Legal Rankings
Buy Now, Regulate Soon
Ten simple things
Funding the Future
Cyber Security for Start-ups
Fit for purchase
The Screen Industry Workers Bill
UK/New Zealand Trade Deal Takes Flight
Palmer v Alalääkkölä
Other articles you
might like
The Broadcasting Standards Authority has concluded it has jurisdiction over an online media outlet that livestreams to New Zealand audiences.
A new Members' bill would ban some social media for users under 16 years old.
A recently published consultation paper proposes changes to update and modernise media and content regulation in New Zealand.







.jpg)



.jpg)

