One Act to Rule Them All
The “Hobbit law” is no more. The Screen Industry Workers Act 2022 (the Act) has now received the Royal assent and will come into force on 30 December 2022.

The “Hobbit law” is no more
The Screen Industry Workers Act 2022 (the Act) has now received the Royal assent and will come into force on 30 December 2022*. The Act has the effect of replacing the Employment Relations (Film Production Work) Amendment Act 2010 (better known as the “Hobbit law”) and introduces significant reform to the screen industry, including the right for screen production workers to bargain collectively. The Government considered these changes necessary to afford greater employment protections to screen production workers, who were otherwise all deemed to be independent contractors (unless they had a written employment agreement).
The Act in its final form is substantially the same as the Screen Industry Workers Bill (the Bill) that we discussed here last year but has a few additional changes.
What does the Act do?
The Act creates new minimum rights and obligations for contracts with screen production workers (being specific workers involved in the production of films, programmes, commercials, and games). It does this by setting out the employment status of “Screen Production Workers” (as defined in the Act), and providing a framework for determining the contractual terms that will apply between Screen Production Workers and the individuals or entities that engage them in relation to screen productions (“Engagers”).
Significantly, the Act introduces:
- the ability for Screen Production Workers to engage in collective bargaining with Engagers to create collective contracts; and
- mandatory minimum requirements for a contract between an Engager and a Screen Production Worker.
Application to existing contracts
The Act applies to all existing contracts between Screen Production Workers and Engagers from the date it comes into effect, but the parties have a further 12 months to amend those contracts to include the new mandatory minimum requirements regarding:
- compliance with health and safety and human rights laws;
- a complaints process relating to bullying, harassment and discrimination;
- a disputes resolution process; and
- termination rights.
Application to employment agreements
However, the Act does not apply to (or supersede any existing agreement between) any employee within the industry who has a specific agreement with an Engager that clearly shows they are an employee (rather than a contractor).
Collective contracts
The collective bargaining process under the Act is organised at two levels.
Any organisation (e.g., a guild or union) that represents Screen Production Workers or Engagers and that is registered with the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment can negotiate collective contracts. Collective bargaining will either take place across an entire occupational group (an “Occupational Contract”) or within a single production or company (an “Enterprise Contract”).
Occupational Contracts are expected by the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment to be the most common collective contract. These contracts will cover all work by a particular “occupational group” (which will be defined within the specific contract e.g., “composers” or “directors”) across all screen productions covered by the Act. Occupational Contracts establish minimum terms and conditions that must be incorporated in any contract between an Engager and a Screen Production Worker within that occupational group, regardless of whether a specific Screen Production Worker or Engager is a member of the organisation(s) that negotiated the Occupational Contract in the first place. Because of the broad impact of Occupational Contracts, the Employment Relations Authority will oversee the collective bargaining process and check an Occupational Contract before it takes effect.
Enterprise Contracts are negotiated directly between a specific Engager and worker organisations. An Enterprise Contract will set the minimum standard of contract for any Screen Production Worker who is engaged by that Engager and (i) is a member of any of the worker organisations that signed the contract, or (ii) whose type of work is specifically set out within the contract (i.e. a worker may be covered if a relevant guild / union signs the contract, even if the worker is not a member of that guild / union). While Enterprise Contracts are negotiated directly between workers and a business, they cannot introduce minimum terms less favourable than those already set out in any applicable Occupational Contract.
While the Act does not remove the ability for an individual Screen Production Worker to negotiate and agree their own contract terms, it does provide:
- the mandatory minimum terms that need to be included; and
- that the terms of an individual contract cannot be less favourable than the terms of any applicable collective contract.
Key changes between the Bill (at its second reading) and the Act
Many of the sections of the Bill have been relocated within the Act to make it easier to read and follow. One of the key differences between the Bill and the Act is the introduction of a new definition of “Workplace Relationship”. The Act clarifies that a Workplace Relationship covers a broad range of relationships, including between a Screen Production Worker and the Engager, a worker or Engager organisation (e.g., a union / guild) and its members, and a worker or Engager organisation and a specific worker or Engager. These changes have been made to highlight that the concept of the Workplace Relationship is ongoing and applies when negotiating a contract, as well as throughout the ongoing relationship between all the parties to, or represented under, that contract.
Key things to consider
- The Act cannot be contracted out of. Any clause in a contract between an Engager and Screen Production Worker that provides that the agreement “will not be subject to the terms of a guild or union agreement” (or similar) will no longer be enforceable. This is because a collective contract made under the Act will apply as a minimum standard, regardless of any provision in a contract that might try to exclude these.
- The Act creates an obligation for parties to act in “good faith” in a Workplace Relationship, including in the negotiation of individual or collective contracts. It is important for parties to keep this in mind when engaging in negotiations, and throughout any ongoing screen production relationship.
- Engagers have an express obligation to provide a contract to a Screen Production Worker for review, to allow the Screen Production Worker to receive advice on it, and to consider any issues raised with the proposed contract.
- New contracts between an Engager and a Screen Production Worker must contain the required statutory minimum terms. In addition, existing contracts must be updated to comply with these minimum terms within 12 months of the commencement of the Act.
- Where a collective contract is in place, parties cannot contract for work covered by that collective contract on terms that are less favourable than what is agreed in the collective contract. For example, when engaging a Screen Production Worker, an Engager will need to consider whether there might be an Occupational Contract in place that would set the minimum standard terms that the contract will need to include. Once an Occupational Contract has been negotiated, existing individual contracts will need to be updated within a year to comply with the new minimum terms established by the Occupational Contract.
Collective bargaining, and the Act itself, will establish minimum terms and conditions for screen production contracts that over time should help to provide certainty for the industry. However, the new bargaining framework, and the industry’s obligations under it, may be complex to navigate in the short term. If you have any questions about the Act, or your responsibilities or rights under it, please do not hesitate to get in touch.
*Except with respect to regulation-making powers, which came into force on 1 October 2022.
Social media image credit: Brands & People
Services in this insight
From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business
Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground
Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand
The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships
New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know
OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now
AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI
New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know
Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia
Consumer law update 2025
Open banking launches in New Zealand
Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act
Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta
Open banking almost live
Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act
Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand
Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand
Open banking regulations released for consultation
Ten tips for buy-side M&A success
A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?
Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)
Important changes made to the Privacy Act
New Zealand may ban social media for young users
Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way
Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet
Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media
Security guidance released for emerging tech companies
Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back
Consumer law update 2024
New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go
The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”
New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour
WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted
Doing business in the Middle East
AI and advertising – What producers need to know
Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs
Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?
Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year
Is End-to-End to end?
Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement
Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released
Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?
Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?
Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation
The copyright conundrum with generative AI
Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools
Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?
Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament
New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline
The long and winding road to royalties
Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal
EU gets closer to AI laws
UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box
A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill
Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data
New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes
Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm
The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society
Common myths about copyright online
Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?
Big boost to gaming
Is your product “AI powered”?
The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right
Space Law in New Zealand
You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law
Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right
Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging
One Act to Rule Them All
A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS
Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020
NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched
Are you being unfair?
Are you legal?
Power Up 2022
A new Companies Office levy is one step closer
Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?
From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners
I'm back, baby
Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force
Paying the price for getting privacy wrong
Can AI be an inventor?
Finfluencer Crackdown
TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch
Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'
Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do
The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t
Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)
The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships
Building Blocks of Trust
Firm News | Legal Rankings
Buy Now, Regulate Soon
Ten simple things
Funding the Future
Cyber Security for Start-ups
Fit for purchase
The Screen Industry Workers Bill
UK/New Zealand Trade Deal Takes Flight
Palmer v Alalääkkölä
Other articles you
might like
The Broadcasting Standards Authority has concluded it has jurisdiction over an online media outlet that livestreams to New Zealand audiences.
The new Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code tightens expectations on health and therapeutic claims, especially in digital advertising.
A new Members' bill would ban some social media for users under 16 years old.







.jpg)



.jpg)

.jpg)