Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement

Big changes to using geographical indicators on labels came into effect in New Zealand on 1 May 2024.

Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade AgreementGeographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement
Category
Insight | IP
Insight
|
IP
Published Date
7
May 2024
Reading Time

The EU-NZ Free Trade Agreement (EU-NZ FTA) was signed mid-last year and came into effect on 1 May 2024. It aims to promote trading relations between New Zealand and the EU, ultimately aiming to increase New Zealand exports by up to $1.8 billion per year by 2035.  

The EU-NZ FTA removes tariffs on the export of horticultural products, wine, honey and other agricultural products including dairy and red meat, and fisheries. While local producers will benefit from increased opportunities for trade, consumers will be able to purchase products from the EU much more cheaply than before.

A summary of the key outcomes of the EU-NZ FTA can be found here.

One of the big changes for New Zealand businesses in the food and beverage / grocery industry is the update to the geographical indications (GI) regime. This has been implemented via amendments to the Geographical Indications (Wines and Spirits) Registration Act 2006 (known from 1 May 2024 as the Geographical Indications Registration Act 2006) (the GI Act). The GI Act already provided for a register, adjacent to the Trade Marks Register, of GIs for New Zealand and international wines and spirits only. The amendments to the GI Act extend the scope of protection to EU GIs for other goods too.

What are geographical indicators?

GIs are signs (most commonly words) that identify a product as originating from a region or area where a quality or other characteristic of the product is attributable to that geographical origin. Perhaps the most famous GI is "Champagne", which can only be used in respect of wine produced in the Champagne region of France. All others must instead be labelled as "sparkling white wine" or "Méthode traditionnelle" (i.e. the process used to produce Champagne, if that is how they are made).

GIs are collective intellectual property rights in that, unlike trade marks, they do not belong to an individual owner or producer. Their value comes from being able to indicate to consumers that the product is authentic and has specific qualities associated with the GI. Any trader that meets the relevant requirements of the GI can use it in respect of their goods. For example, any winemaker in New Zealand can use "Central Otago" if at least 85% of the wine is made from grapes harvested within the geographic boundary shown on the register and if the rest of the wine is made from grapes harvested elsewhere in New Zealand.

In New Zealand, GIs are only registrable for wines and spirits; however, overseas GIs are protected for a range of other goods. One of the outcomes of the EU-NZ FTA is mutual protection for some existing EU and New Zealand GIs. The EU has provided a list of 1,975 GIs now protected in New Zealand (see the Annex to the EU-NZ FTA here (Section A)). These mostly cover foods and beverages, but also include essential oils. Reciprocally, 23 New Zealand wine GIs are protected in the EU (these are also listed in the Annex (Section B)). Another outcome of the EU-NZ FTA is a process to protect additional NZ GIs in the EU (and vice versa) in the future, including, in the case of EU GIs that can be protected in NZ, for "flowers and ornamental plants" and "products of the milling industry".

EU GIs now protected in New Zealand

With effect from 1 May 2024, the EU GIs listed in the Annex are automatically protected in New Zealand. Likewise, the NZ GIs listed in the Annex are automatically protected in the EU. Practically, this means that use of the EU GIs is restricted in New Zealand, even if the packaging also indicates the product’s real place of origin, or uses qualifications like "kind" or "style". For example, the term "Bordeaux" is not able to be used in respect of wine unless it comes from the Bordeaux region in France and is made according to the rules of its production.    

Of the EU GIs that are protected in New Zealand, several are terms that many New Zealand consumers would likely interpret as generic descriptors, for example "feta", "prosecco" and "port". For these, phase-out periods of between 5-9 years apply, allowing users time to adopt alternative terms. To benefit from the phase-out period, businesses must clearly indicate the true origin of the good on their packaging, for example by adding "made in New Zealand". A full list of the EU GI’s that have phase-out periods is available here.

For users of "gruyère" and "parmesan" a "prior user" exemption may be available, allowing indefinite use of these terms. For this exemption to apply, the prior user must have used the relevant term in good faith since at least 1 May 2019 and continued use of the term must be accompanied by a clear indication of the true origin of the cheese. Several cheese producers have already been identified as prior users by MFAT (see the list here).

Clarification to come

There are still several unknowns concerning how the protection of EU GIs in New Zealand will be enforced, for example:

• Whether the restrictions on use of EU GIs under the GI Act apply only in respect of the relevant product class for which they are registered, or whether use of a GI as an ingredient in another good that doesn’t fall within the relevant product class is also subject to the restrictions under the GI Act. It is possible, but not clear under the GI Act, that the restrictions only apply in relation to the relevant product class, and that other use (such as for ingredients) will be regulated under the Fair Trading Act 1986 (misleading and deceptive conduct, and unsubstantiated representations provisions).

• How images (e.g. a cube of white cheese) and soundalike names should be treated. Again, it is likely this would be managed under the Fair Trading Act 1986 rather than the GI Act.

• The status (if any) under the GI Act of MFAT’s prior user list, and whether other users not listed but who meet the requirements of the "prior user" status are able to benefit from that exemption.

We anticipate guidance on some of these matters will be provided by the relevant Ministries.

If the GIs impact your business, or you would like to know more about GIs or the EU-NZ FTA, please get in touch.

Services in this insight

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.

Services in this insight

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.

Services in this insight

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore.

There are no services for this current insight. Take a look at our services page for more information on our different offerings.
Previous Article
Next Article

Modern slavery regulation on the way – Is your business ready?

From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business

Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground

Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand

The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships

New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code

IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know

OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now

AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI

New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know

Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia

Consumer law update 2025

Open banking launches in New Zealand

Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act

Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta

Open banking almost live

Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act

Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand

Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand

Open banking regulations released for consultation

Ten tips for buy-side M&A success

A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?

Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)

Important changes made to the Privacy Act

New Zealand may ban social media for young users

Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way

Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet

Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media

Security guidance released for emerging tech companies

Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back

Consumer law update 2024

New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go

The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”

New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour

WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted

Doing business in the Middle East

AI and advertising – What producers need to know

Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs

Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?

Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code

Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year

Is End-to-End to end?

Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement

Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released

Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?

Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?

Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation

The copyright conundrum with generative AI

Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools

Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?

Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament

New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline

The long and winding road to royalties

Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal

EU gets closer to AI laws

UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box

A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill

Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data

New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes

Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm

The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society

Common myths about copyright online

Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?

Big boost to gaming

Is your product “AI powered”?

The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right

Space Law in New Zealand

You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law

Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right

Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging

One Act to Rule Them All

A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS

Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020

NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched

Are you being unfair?

A new Companies Office levy is one step closer

Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?

From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners

Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force

Paying the price for getting privacy wrong

Can AI be an inventor?

Finfluencer Crackdown

TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch

Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'

Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do

The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t

Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)

The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships

Building Blocks of Trust

Firm News | Legal Rankings

Buy Now, Regulate Soon

Ten simple things

Funding the Future

Cyber Security for Start-ups

Fit for purchase

The Screen Industry Workers Bill

UK/New Zealand Trade Deal Takes Flight

Other articles you
might like

Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia
22
December 2025

A recent Court of Appeal decision provides long awaited clarity for businesses on the lawful use of another party’s trade mark in New Zealand.

Caitlin Hadlee

Special Counsel

Ellie Ryan

Senior Associate

Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta
13
November 2025

Two contrasting court judgments have been released on whether it is legal to train LLMs using copyright protected works.

Caitlin Hadlee

Special Counsel

Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act
5
September 2025

The EU Data Act is about to change how Kiwi firms handle customer data.

Edwin Lim

Partner

Kyra Vince

Special Counsel – Knowledge