New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes
New Zealand and the United Kingdom have signed a free trade agreement that includes important reforms in the tech, media and IP spaces.
.jpeg)
The Government announced recently that New Zealand and the United Kingdom have signed a free trade agreement (FTA), which comes into force at the end of this month – on 31 May 2023.
While the spotlight has been on the elimination of tariffs on imports and exports of physical goods like meat, dairy, honey and wine (which is expected to save New Zealand exporters approximately $37 million each year), the FTA goes far beyond that – including some key reforms for New Zealand in the tech, media and IP spaces as discussed below.
Intellectual property
What are the key changes?
Extension of copyright term
For many categories of copyright works in New Zealand, including books, screenplays, lyrics and artistic works, New Zealand has agreed to extend the term of copyright for these works by 20 years (changing from “life of the author plus 50 years” to “life of the author plus 70 years”). Where the term is not defined by the life of a person, it will be extended from 50 to 70 years. This will effectively bring New Zealand into line with other OECD countries.
This change won’t happen immediately: there is a 15-year transition period, so the change will need to be implemented by 31 May 2038 at the latest. The change will also only apply to works that are still within their current term of protection at the time the extension is implemented. In other words, it won’t extend the term of copyright protection to works that have already fallen out of protection and are now in the public domain.
Expanded performer rights
The FTA will give additional rights to New Zealand performers – conferring on performers an exclusive right in relation to the playing of sound recordings of their performances in public. This will involve an amendment to s 174B of the Copyright Act 1994. The section currently states that a performer’s rights are infringed by a person who (without consent and by means of a recording), communicates to the public the whole or a substantial part of a performance. The amendment will add a further infringement, being where the person “plays in public the whole or a substantial part of a performance”.
This will apply only to new sound recordings made after the FTA enters into force.
Introduction of an Artist’s Resale Right Scheme
New Zealand is required to introduce an Artist’s Resale Rights Scheme within 2 years of the FTA being in force. These schemes give visual artists a royalty on the resale of their artworks in the secondary art market, for so long as the work is copyright protected. Australia and the UK already have these schemes in place.
It will be up to New Zealand legislation to determine:
o the royalty rate (in Australia, 5%, in the UK, between 0.25% to 4% depending on resale value);
o the threshold value at which the scheme applies, i.e. the minimum resale value (in Australia, $1,000, in the UK, £1,000); and
o the method by which the royalties are collected.
The above changes are particularly relevant to content creators and those looking to use and leverage the output of creative endeavours in New Zealand.
Geographical indications
New Zealand has not made any firm commitments in the FTA on the protection of geographical indications (being signs used on products that identify the product as originating from a particular area, like Champagne) – although New Zealand has said in a side letter that the sale of whisky labelled or advertised with representations of Scottish whisky localities (such as Combeltown, Islay, Highland, Lowland or Speyside) will not be permitted in New Zealand, unless the product has been wholly manufactured in Scotland.
Digital trade
The FTA includes further commitments in relation to digital trade, or trade by electronic means. These fall into three groups:
Measures to "boost confidence" among users of digital trade
New Zealand will be required to maintain a legal framework that covers electronic transactions (which it currently has in Part 4 of the Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017), and a framework for the protection of personal information of users of digital trade (which is broadly covered already by the Privacy Act 2020 as the Act is technology agnostic).
The FTA also addresses “unsolicited commercial electronic messages”, being electronic messages sent for commercial or marketing purposes without the recipient’s consent. New Zealand’s current law (the Unsolicited Electronic Messages Act 2007) prohibits the sending of unsolicited commercial electronic messages that have a “New Zealand link” (being, for example, that the message originated in New Zealand, or the recipient was physically present in New Zealand when the message was accessed). The FTA goes further: New Zealand has agreed to ensure that these messages are clearly identifiable, disclose who is sending the messages and enable recipients to have them stopped (free of charge and at any time). Parliament has not yet signalled any change to New Zealand’s Act to reflect these additional commitments.
Addressing practical digital issues
The FTA will prohibit New Zealand from depriving e-contracts of legal effect solely on the basis that they were made electronically. There are similar provisions around the admissibility and legal effect of electronic documents, signatures or authenticating data, and electronic invoices. Many of these commitments are already covered to a large extent by legislation (the Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017, referred to above), but the FTA does reaffirm support for these measures in helping to dismantle unnecessary barriers to digital trade.
New Zealand and the UK have also agreed to allow the cross-border transfer of information (including personal information) by electronic means where it is part of an investor or service supplier conducting business, and to not require an investor or service supplier to use or locate computing facilities in the other’s jurisdiction as a condition for conducting business there. However this does not detract from a business’ obligations under New Zealand's Privacy Act, including the overseas disclosure obligations under IPP12.
Encouragement of co-operation, inclusion and participation
The FTA promotes compatibility between the UK and NZ’s regimes for digital identities (New Zealand’s Digital Identity Services Trust Framework Act 2023 received assent last month). The FTA also recognises and requires both countries to promote “digital inclusion” – that all people and businesses should participate in and benefit from digital trade, including Māori, women, those with disabilities, rural populations and low socio-economic groups.
New Zealand has also agreed not to impose any regulations that would require a supplier of a commercial ICT product that uses cryptography to provide access to any proprietary information relating to cryptography – for instance, ICT suppliers cannot be required to disclose a private key, or algorithm specification. Despite this protection, the FTA is clear that it does not affect the ability of law enforcement agencies to require a supplier to provide access to encrypted or unencrypted communications.
How else will the FTA impact tech, media and IP?
From a tech, media and IP perspective, there are a few more points worth mentioning:
Māori IP interests
New Zealand and the UK have agreed to co-operate to enhance the understanding of matters of interest to Māori relating to intellectual property. The UK has also provided a side letter acknowledging Ngāti Toa Rangatira’s guardianship of the Haka “Ka Mate”, and its particular importance for New Zealand (following recent controversy).
Investment
New Zealand has agreed to increase the threshold above which a UK non-government investor must get approval to invest significant business assets in New Zealand to $200m (putting UK investors on the same footing as investors in other nations, such as China and Korea). This is expected to enable a greater level of market access for UK investors. Both New Zealand and the UK have also agreed not to treat investors from the other nation any less favourably than domestic investors, or investors from other global nations.
Small business
The FTA has a distinct focus on assisting SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises), particularly to grow and participate in the area of digital trade. There will be a requirement for information about the FTA to be easily accessible online for New Zealand SMEs that want to trade with the UK.
Consumer protection
The FTA is a “first” in that it also includes a chapter on consumer protection. As part of this, the UK and New Zealand have agreed to co-operate to develop ways to enhance access for redress for consumers (including online consumers) in each other’s jurisdictions.
The FTA is, among other things, intended to create more opportunities for Kiwi businesses looking to leverage tech, media and IP assets, and to bring New Zealand in line with other OECD countries in terms of the protections offered to creative output.
If you would like to know more about how the FTA may affect your tech, media or IP transaction, please get in touch.
Services in this insight
Consultation opens on New Zealand's payment services regulation
Modern slavery regulation on the way – Is your business ready?
From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business
Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground
Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand
The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships
New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know
OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now
AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI
New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know
Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia
Consumer law update 2025
Open banking launches in New Zealand
Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act
Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta
Open banking almost live
Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act
Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand
Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand
Open banking regulations released for consultation
Ten tips for buy-side M&A success
A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?
Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)
Important changes made to the Privacy Act
New Zealand may ban social media for young users
Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way
Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet
Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media
Security guidance released for emerging tech companies
Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back
Consumer law update 2024
New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go
The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”
New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour
WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted
Doing business in the Middle East
AI and advertising – What producers need to know
Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs
Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?
Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year
Is End-to-End to end?
Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement
Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released
Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?
Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?
Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation
The copyright conundrum with generative AI
Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools
Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?
Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament
New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline
The long and winding road to royalties
Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal
EU gets closer to AI laws
UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box
A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill
Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data
New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes
Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm
The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society
Common myths about copyright online
Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?
Big boost to gaming
Is your product “AI powered”?
The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right
Space Law in New Zealand
You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law
Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right
Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging
One Act to Rule Them All
A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS
Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020
NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched
Are you being unfair?
Are you legal?
Power Up 2022
A new Companies Office levy is one step closer
Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?
From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners
I'm back, baby
Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force
Paying the price for getting privacy wrong
Can AI be an inventor?
Finfluencer Crackdown
TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch
Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'
Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do
The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t
Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)
The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships
Building Blocks of Trust
Firm News | Legal Rankings
Buy Now, Regulate Soon
Ten simple things
Funding the Future
Cyber Security for Start-ups
Fit for purchase
The Screen Industry Workers Bill
Other articles you
might like
New Zealand is consulting on reforms to its payment services regulatory framework, with submissions closing 3 July 2026.
Negotiating a fintech partnership agreement is not a zero sum game.
New rule 3A means individuals must be notified about indirect collection under the Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025.
.jpg)












