New Zealand’s online gambling laws get a shake up
.jpg)
The Online Casino Gambling Act 2026 (the Act) came into force on 1 May 2026, meaning the start of a transition towards a new regime that will permit up to 15 licensed operators to offer online casino gambling in New Zealand. Following the transition period, non-licensed providers will not be allowed to advertise or operate in New Zealand.
Background
The Gambling Act 2003 allows gambling operations to be carried out in New Zealand in limited circumstances. Except for the TAB and Lotto, the legislation strictly prohibits New Zealand based online gambling operators from providing services to New Zealanders and makes it illegal for overseas online gambling operators to advertise to New Zealanders. However, this ban does not prevent New Zealanders from accessing online gambling products from operators located outside of (and not considered to be based in) New Zealand. In 2019, a Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) public discussion document estimated that in an 18-month period, New Zealanders spent approximately $381 million on offshore online gambling.
The Act is intended to correct this legislative gap so that those who gamble online can receive some protection and the Government can collect uncaptured tax revenue.
The Act
Under the Act, all online casino gambling operators wanting to offer products and services to New Zealanders will be subject to a licensing regime. The Act defines online casino gambling as “gambling at a distance through a communication device” to:
• participate in gambling that “relies on a random number generator” or other chance-based outcome generations (like slot machines or lotteries);
• participate in casino table gambling (e.g., blackjack, poker or baccarat); or
• bet, pay, or stake money on the outcome of computer-simulated sporting events.
The regime will make up to 15 licences available to online operators through a competitive process. Once licensed, the operator will be able to advertise, and provide online casino gambling, to New Zealanders. A licence will be valid for up to three years, with the possibility to renew for up to five years.
To obtain a licence, operators must take part in a three-stage process led by the DIA. The process involves an operator submitting:
• an expression-of-interest (EOI);
• a bid for a licence in a competitive process; and
• a comprehensive application.
We discuss the timeline and requirements for each stage in more detail below. Note, the EOI and competitive process will be run through the Government Electronic Tender Service (GETS). Interested operators should sign up to GETS to ensure they are receiving the most up-to-date information on the DIA’s process.
July 2026: EOI opens
To participate in the competitive process, operators must first submit an EOI. The legislation prescribes a list of matters that must be disclosed in the EOI. This includes information about:
• the operator itself;
• the operator’s key officers;
• the operator’s ownership structure;
• the operator’s platform and branding;
• whether another entity or individual has significant influence over the operator;
• the source and amount of capital available to the operator; and
• any contributions the operator makes or intends to make for community purposes in New Zealand.
The DIA has indicated that the purpose of this stage is to ensure that the operator has sufficient capital, has not been convicted of any crimes, and that accepting the applicant’s EOI will not prejudice New Zealand’s reputation. If an operator’s EOI is accepted, they will be invited to participate in the competitive process.
September 2026: Competitive process takes place
The Secretary of Internal Affairs (the Secretary) is responsible for setting the rules and managing the competitive process. The first competitive process that will be undertaken will be an auction. See here for more information on the DIA’s auction guidance.
October 2026: Application process begins
Successful operators at the competitive process stage will be asked to apply for the licence and pay a prescribed fee of $19,000. The application must be accompanied by the operator’s:
• business plan;
• advertising and marketing strategy;
• consumer protection strategy;
• harm prevention and minimisation strategy;
• compliance strategy; and
• details about the online gambling platform, branding, and user interface.
Based on the information provided, the Secretary will assess whether the operator is suitable to hold a licence. The Secretary will also consider whether the operator has a commercial presence in New Zealand and assess if the operator makes contributions to the New Zealand community.
The Secretary cannot grant a licence to an operator that would have a “significant influence” over more than three licences at any time. The Act defines a person as having “significant influence” if:
• they are a licensed operator;
• the percentage of the voting power that the person can directly or indirectly exercise or control at meetings of the licensed operator is 20% or more; or
• the percentage of securities in the licensed operator that the person directly or indirectly owns or controls is 20% or more.
If an application is accepted, and the operator has received its licence, it will be permitted to advertise and conduct online gambling operations in accordance with the Act (and any regulations made under the Act) and the conditions that the Secretary may impose on the licence.
Requirements for licensed operators
Licensed operators will need to:
• account for GST;
• pay an annual online casino gambling duty of 16% (the DIA will set aside 4% of this duty to make financial contributions to the community);
• pay an annual problem gambling levy of 1.24%; and
• pay an annual general licensing levy based on a fixed percentage of the operator’s gross gambling revenue.
Licensed operators will be required to display a registration icon on its gambling platform and on any visual advertisement that it publishes. Operators will also need to play a registration audio mark on its platform and in any audio advertisement.
Licensed operators must take all reasonable steps to ensure that a gambling participant is at least 18 years old. Operators must also exclude persons who that identify themselves, or are otherwise identified by the operator, to be a problem gambler.
Operators must establish, maintain and administer a publicly available complaints process. All complaints must be investigated and responded to within 40 days and in accordance with the complaints process. Operators must also maintain a complaints register and report to the Secretary every 3 months on the number of complaints received during that period, and any additional information required by the regulations.
The Act leaves a number of key details to be determined through regulation – the regulations were published in early June and come into force on 3 July 2026. The regulations cover:
• harm prevention and minimisation – for example, including restrictions on the amounts that may be bet, paid or staked as consideration and procedures to enable the identification of problem gamblers;
• consumer protection – such as requiring operators to collect information related to a customer’s identity and verifying their age;
• advertising and marketing – this includes controls on how operators can advertise their services; and
• fees and levies payable by operators.
Transition period and penalties
From 1 December 2026, operators that have not applied for a licence must stop providing online casino gambling in New Zealand. Operators that have applied for a licence before 1 December can continue providing services (but not advertise into New Zealand) until its application is decided or 1 June 2027 (whichever is earlier).
If an operator advertises or operates without a licence after the transition period it could be liable to a civil penalty of up to $5 million for a body corporate, or $300,000 for an individual. The DIA can also issue formal warnings and take enforcement measures (including issuing and enforcing take-down notices).
Although this framework is relatively clear domestically, enforcing it offshore may present practical challenges. Online casino providers may be located in jurisdictions with limited regulatory co-operation with New Zealand, which could complicate investigations and the enforcement of civil penalties. During the initial stages of the process, the Minister of Internal Affairs indicated that geo-blocking by the DIA would not be used to prevent New Zealanders from accessing unlicensed websites. In practice, the DIA is likely to rely on intermediaries (such as engagement with app stores and internet service providers to help enforce take-down orders) and, as a result, some level of non-compliant offshore activity targeting New Zealand consumers may persist despite the new legislative settings.
The Act is the first significant update in New Zealand gambling laws in over 20 years and we expect the application process to be highly competitive. Please get in touch with our team if you have any questions or need advice on anything discussed in this article.
Services in this insight
New Zealand’s online gambling laws get a shake up
Consultation opens on New Zealand's payment services regulation
Modern slavery regulation on the way – Is your business ready?
From Hertzian waves to hyperlinks – What the BSA’s online decision means for your business
Space Law in New Zealand — Signals from the ground
Cyber security changes flagged for New Zealand
The four Cs of successful fintech partnerships
New rule 3A introduced to the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
IPP3A is nearly in force – What agencies need to know
OPC shifts public enquiries online – What agencies should do now
AI as a confidante? Legal privilege and the ever-increasing use of AI
New Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code – What you need to know
Building blocks of trade mark law: New Zealand approach to "use as a trade mark" now compatible with Australia
Consumer law update 2025
Open banking launches in New Zealand
Is fair something to fear? The Government announces beefed-up Fair Trading Act
Is it fair? Lessons from Bartz v Anthropic and Kadrey v Meta
Open banking almost live
Why New Zealand businesses should care about the EU Data Act
Product labelling changes flagged for New Zealand
Biometric Processing Privacy Code 2025 introduced to New Zealand
Open banking regulations released for consultation
Ten tips for buy-side M&A success
A recipe for disaster – Is caramel a copyright work?
Becoming a Globally Renowned Fintech Nation (and how regulation can light the path)
Important changes made to the Privacy Act
New Zealand may ban social media for young users
Customer and Product Data Act update – Open banking officially on the way
Tips from the trenches – Your AI policy cheat sheet
Significant regulatory reform proposed for New Zealand media
Security guidance released for emerging tech companies
Customer and Product Data Bill – Select Committee reports back
Consumer law update 2024
New Zealand’s Artist Resale Royalty is ready to go
The shape of coffee – “Moccona” vs “Vittoria”
New Zealand’s Copyright Act gets a sense of humour
WIPO’s traditional knowledge treaty is adopted
Doing business in the Middle East
AI and advertising – What producers need to know
Seven contract clauses every freelancer needs
Baby Reindeer – When truth is stranger than fiction?
Our comments on the Biometric Processing Privacy Code
Therapeutic Products Act to be repealed this year
Is End-to-End to end?
Geographical indications – Changes uncorked by the EU-NZ Fair Trade Agreement
Lawyers and Generative AI – New NZ Law Society guidance released
Facing the future – A biometrics code of practice for New Zealand?
Deepfakes and style mimicking – Should New Zealand adopt a right of publicity?
Five Eyes release the Five Principles to Secure Innovation
The copyright conundrum with generative AI
Innovate at the speed of trust – Privacy Commissioner releases new guidance on artificial intelligence tools
Political advertising on social media: sludge or copyright quagmire?
Privacy Amendment Bill introduced to Parliament
New Data Privacy Framework: Meta gets a lifeline
The long and winding road to royalties
Implications of the Supreme Court’s “new debt” approach in Mainzeal
EU gets closer to AI laws
UK Supreme Court puts Quincecare ‘duty’ back in its box
A Deep Dive into The Customer and Product Data Bill
Searching for a shield: Meta’s €1.2 billion fine and international transfers in the age of Big Data
New NZ-UK Free Trade Agreement signals tech, media and IP law changes
Ditch the fax! Tips for building a tech-savvy law firm
The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 – what you need to know for your society
Common myths about copyright online
Artificial artist, or artificial plagiarist?
Big boost to gaming
Is your product “AI powered”?
The latest on New Zealand’s Consumer Data Right
Space Law in New Zealand
You Cannot Defame the Dead or Can You? Tikanga Māori and NZ Defamation Law
Open Banking is coming – through the Consumer Data Right
Massive SEC Fines for Companies Using Text and Instant Messaging
One Act to Rule Them All
A Legal Guide to Kicking SaaS
Potential changes to the Privacy Act 2020
NZ's Social Media "Code of Practice" Launched
Are you being unfair?
Are you legal?
Power Up 2022
A new Companies Office levy is one step closer
Has Paramount Pictures gone maverick?
From Russia with love: The ‘other’ Russian conflict targeting intellectual property owners
I'm back, baby
Retail Payment System Act 2022 now in force
Paying the price for getting privacy wrong
Can AI be an inventor?
Finfluencer Crackdown
TIN Fintech Insights Report Launch
Britain seeks to regulate 'Big Tech'
Disclosure of personal information - how to, not don't do
The Spice May Flow, But The Copyright Doesn’t
Sound Recording Ownership (Taylor's Version)
The Lowdown (and Lockdown) on Summer Clerkships
Building Blocks of Trust
Firm News | Legal Rankings
Buy Now, Regulate Soon
Ten simple things
Funding the Future
Cyber Security for Start-ups
Fit for purchase
Other articles you
might like
The Broadcasting Standards Authority has concluded it has jurisdiction over an online media outlet that livestreams to New Zealand audiences.
The new Therapeutic and Health Advertising Code tightens expectations on health and therapeutic claims, especially in digital advertising.
A new Members' bill would ban some social media for users under 16 years old.
.jpg)














.jpg)

.jpg)
